Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why?
Beggars are scattered in every place, some people think that because of increasing poverty all over the world, so we have to help them by giving funds. Nonetheless, I definitely disagree with that action for some rationales which I will delve into the details with convincing reasons and relevant examples in the subsequent paragraph.
The first exquisite point that comes to my mind that donating money to the homeless will encourage them to continue those demeanor. Even If they have the opportunity to catch a job, they will juxtapose between the revenue that they achieve with effort and the other that they gain an enormous of the fund without any effort, unsurprisingly, they will pick a begger work. Thus, we have to minimize that tricks and understand that preventing donation, in that case, is for their benefits and our social development. Additionally, It is out of the question to distinct between the needy beggars and the deceived ones. Therefore, a tremendous of the non-profit organizations are speading all over the cosmos to help the beggars out from that dire circumatances by providing them the sustenances, covers, and shelters. To shed light on that, In my suburb a huge quantum of homeless and beggars. First, I felt passion toward them and I used to give them a regular charity, however, one day I saw them Inside one of famous casino, playing raffle tickets and cards. Hence, I realized that I did a mistake by giving them money. Furtherfore, I think deeply and tried to correct my fallacies, so I informed the organization and they investigated in that issues an tried to provide them with some works and tasks and compensate their effort with money.
The second equally significant point to be mentioned that teaching the beggars a job will reflect on our society. As they will know that they have responsibilities toward their work and this work is the main source of their life as it will be the fundamental source for buying their basic needs. Definitely, they will work hard to increase their revenue and also they will respect themselves as they are productive members of our community. As a result, the country will develop and progress dramatically. A salient example, our mayor obligates all the beggars to be gathered in the meeting room every week. He brought the expertise to teach them some of the handy works as for girls crochets and for males cutting the wood, painting and fixing the small stuff at home. Eventually, he provided them with jobs and also they advertised for their products's hand-made. Admittedly, their income boosted and they felt they became a member of the community. Keeping their compounds clean, not destruct anything. Not only that but also they blame any person to do that.
To wrap up, contemplating in that statement, I definitely assert that we have not donated to the beggars because this actions bringing up them to reiterate the same behaviors and also we have to solve their problem to produce an energetic people in the society
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 117, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this demeanor' or 'those demeanors'?
Suggestion: this demeanor; those demeanors
...omeless will encourage them to continue those demeanor. Even If they have the opportunity to c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1251, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on and they investigated in that issues an tried to provide them with some works a...
^^
Line 11, column 649, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... He brought the expertise to teach them some of the handy works as for girls crochets and f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, therefore, thus, as for, i think, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2512.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 508.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94488188976 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74751043592 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72862978725 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515748031496 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6584112515 48.9658058833 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13636363636 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127078348186 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405011597342 0.076458572812 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400216425764 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838596994757 0.150856017488 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043811602476 0.0645574589148 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.