Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Compare and Contrast these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays getting a university degree is much more popular than it was ever before. People have different views about how much choice students should have with regard to what they can study at university. While I can understand why some argue that it would be better for students to be forced into certain key subject areas, I believe that everyone should be able to study the course of their choice.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why people believe that universities should only offer subjects that will be useful in the future. the most obvious reason is that they may assert those university courses like medicine, engineering and information technology are more likely to be beneficial than certain art degrees. From a personal perspective, it can be argued that these courses provide more job opportunities, career progression, better salaries, and therefore an improved quality of life for students who take them. moreover, On the societal level, by forcing people to choose particular university subjects, governments can ensure that any knowledge and skill gaps in the economy are covered. also, a focus on technology in higher education could lead to new inventions, economic growth, and greater future prosperity. These are why some people believe that studying subjects that will be of great use in future is better.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students should be free to choose their preferred areas of study. First, society will benefit more if our students are passionate about what they are learning. Those who argue that having to study the subjects offered by university means a better job opportunity fail to take into account the job satisfaction which comes with passion. Second, nobody can really predict which areas of knowledge will be most useful to society in the future, and it may be that employers begin to value creative thinking skills above practical or technical skills. Therefore what seems to increase you chance of finding a good job may prove less useful in future. If this were the case, perhaps we would need more students of art, history and philosophy than of science or technology. From these, it is clear why so many others including me, gravitate towards freedom of choice when it comes to subjects to study at university.
In conclusion, although it might seem sensible for universities to focus only on the most useful subjects, I personally prefer the current system in which people have the right to study whatever they like.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ects that will be useful in the future. the most obvious reason is that they may as...
^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ity of life for students who take them. moreover, On the societal level, by forcing peop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
... skill gaps in the economy are covered. also, a focus on technology in higher educat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ls above practical or technical skills. Therefore what seems to increase you chance of fi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 691, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...inding a good job may prove less useful in future. If this were the case, perhaps we woul...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'really', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'in conclusion', 'in spite of', 'with regard to']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230769230769 0.229887763892 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.162637362637 0.158761421928 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.101098901099 0.0866891130778 117% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0417582417582 0.046263068375 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0483516483516 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125274725275 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0241758241758 0.0351676179071 69% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61871731197 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0351648351648 0.0309702414327 114% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0637362637363 0.0887237588012 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.043956043956 0.0209618222197 210% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0373626373626 0.0139019557991 269% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2521.0 2387.08602151 106% => OK
No of words: 415.0 408.028673835 102% => OK
Chars per words: 6.07469879518 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.387951807229 0.338922669872 114% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.277108433735 0.251872472559 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.178313253012 0.174417080927 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115662650602 0.112833075102 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61871731197 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534939759036 0.524397521467 102% => OK
Word variations: 61.0529017775 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6684587814 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4117647059 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2502840841 48.84282405 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.294117647 120.699889404 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.5533526081 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.764705882353 0.644075263715 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 52.1226080794 45.7405998639 114% => OK
Elegance: 1.50434782609 1.45489161554 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506369990869 0.300154397459 169% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0972624175099 0.103427244359 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0648899091898 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.491364416825 0.497263757937 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168340891912 0.151897553556 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183007775354 0.114077575197 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909467103636 0.0781384742642 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.328494515667 0.336927656856 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0825094421507 0.067059652881 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338459795005 0.210909579961 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688187713633 0.0618886996521 111% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8870967742 109% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.86379928315 52% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 13.0 8.42114695341 154% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.75985663082 72% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 13.6433691756 125% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.