Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In the given issue, the author states that some people think that human needs to utilize the land for farms, housing, and industries are more important than saving land for endangered animals. I would partially agree with the author since there have been many incidences of humans taking over the natural habitats. However, the efforts of mankind to preserve the natural flora and fauna can't be ignored.
We live in a generation, where population all around the world is rising exponentially. In the woke of this, expanding the natural residential areas to occupy the increasing population is the only solution. But, while doing so, humans tend to forget that due to their expansion, some animals will lose their natural habitat. Also, cutting down huge forests can lead to an increase in pollution and consequently a harmful environment. Humans forget that doing so disrupts the natural life cycle and can prove to be very dangerous for the animals. Along with the residential expansion, humans tend to even acquire natural lands for industry purposes and create a more harmful environment altogether. So, it is true as the author suggests that humans are turning more ignorant about the other species on the planet and are thinking about their own good.
While the above is true for most scenarios, we also have many Sanctuaries and National Parks that are meant to preserve the natural habitat and the endangered animals in particular. Strict laws have been made to prevent animal hunting for commercial purposes. Due to increased advancements in the field of zoology, biology, and biochemistry, humans today are able to preserve the existing species and also the DNAs of the species that are on the verge of extinction. This helps them to study these animals and also carry out experiments that can lead to their hybrid species and preserve the characteristics. All of this is possible due to a lot of people around the world being passionate and interested in saving the natural flora and fauna around the earth. So, as far as the author's claim is considered, humans have not only saved the endangered species but have worked beyond to preserve them.
As I would like to conclude, while the author's claim is true, I think regulatory laws must be undertaken by every country to prevent human interference in the natural habitation and strict rules while expanding in a forest area. This will prevent the endangering of more species and improve life-cycle balance. Also, the advancements in the preservation of these species will help to see a better future and fewer chances of completely losing any type of animal or plant from the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...to preserve the natural flora and fauna cant be ignored. We live in a generation,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, while, as to, i think, in particular, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2212.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01587301587 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67131538282 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49433106576 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 709.2 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4462508418 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.421052632 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 20.6045352989 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217285283976 0.236089414692 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704855421799 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0812812012423 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15018915027 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779559387991 0.0645574589148 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.