Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate with them more often. What do you think?
The more complex the human's life become, the greater issues will appear, this is a general rule in all modern communications. Our relationships are mainly affected by not only the quality of our behvavior but also the quantity of our communications. In this regard, some people thinks that it is better to stay with others for a long time, however, other disagree. In my own perspective, I do believe that if we want to be successful in any relationship, we should spend sufficient time with our partners.
First of all, the more time we spend with one of our friends, the deaper our relationship will be. In fact, people make friend based on their similarities, therefore, as we find more equal issues to speak, our realtionship becomes more strong and this will occur if we spend much time being in contact with each other. My life is a perfect example of this idea. I had numerous friends when I was at university because I am generally a sociable man and easilly trigger a conversatoin with unknown people. However, I have lost most of my friends after just 2 years of my graduation. This is just because of the low amount of time that I spent in last two years. I can remember that we stay in a small room with a lot of my friends dealing with our projects and doing our homeworks, as a result, we have made a perfect relationship at those time. But now, we rarely visit each other and consequently our communication become less stronger than those time.
Secondly, being in constant contact with others show them our loyalty and can mentally have a positive effect on our relationship. In fact, there is a general belief that under no circumstances should not keep away from our friends, this demostrates how important our friend are and cosequently can strengthen our communications. For instance, I had a friend from my high school and we had perfect memories with each other. The key parameters that we think influences our realtionship is our loyalty to it. We were beside each other even in terrible situations and I solved most of my problems with the hepl of him. Therefore, he is more resembelance to my brother rather than my friend. He himself has a similar opinios toward our relationships which is mainly related to the quality and quantity of our times. In this way, I think that the duration of our communication can enhance the quality of our relationships.
In sum, above from aforementioned explanation, it is obvious that I think having a perfect relationship is exactly in line with the time that we spend on it. That's why we should act in this way to improve our communications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
The more complex the humans life become, the greater issues will ap...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less strong'?
Suggestion: less strong
...d consequently our communication become less stronger than those time. Secondly, being in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...line with the time that we spend on it. Thats why we should act in this way to improv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, i think, in fact, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 84.0 43.0788530466 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70742358079 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94174090515 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486899563319 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.82648057 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.40909090909 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400470222446 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125423725764 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772830405232 0.0737576698707 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279122780392 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244726678544 0.0645574589148 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.