Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, we have various learning styles, and it is critically important that we look for a style that matches our academic preferences. Some people incline to a discussion-based class approach, while others disagree. In my opinion, I undoubtedly, reckon that lecture-based class is more beneficial than discussion for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, lectures ensure that students get the essential information out of the academic subjects. On the other hand, in the discussion, only a few students lead the talk according to what they want, yet they ignore what others want. For instance, when I was a freshman, I got enrolled in a history class about ancient Egyptian civilization in a discussion class. Frankly, I did not gain the knowledge that I was supposed to get because two students kept engaged in an endless argument with the professor, which reflected negatively on my grades. When I had the same class in my sophomore, unlike the discussion class, I obtained a tremendous amount of information, and I scored high as well. If it had not for the lecture learning, I would never have achieved that progress. As you can see, lecturers do create a better learning environment.
Secondly, students in the lecture-style still can raise their hands and ask whatever questions they want. For example, last year, I took a lecture class in introductory chemistry, and we were almost 150 students, maybe more. As you can imagine, if the educator had allowed a discussion during a lecture, it would have been absolute chaos. However, my professor used to set aside some time at the end of a lesson solely for discussion. Thus, students who understood everything can take their belongings and leave quietly; other students who did understand some points can stay to get clarification from the instructor, which created a small, but useful discussion. This experience taught me that learning in the lecture style also does have room for discourse in a more organized manner than just a discussion class.
In conclusion, I believe that the lecture-class style is more advantageous than the discussion-based approach. Not only it guarantees to attain all the required knowledge out of academic subjects, but it also enables learners to discuss in a better systematic way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explore in the following essay. First, lectures ensure that students get...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...create a better learning environment. Secondly, students in the lecture-style ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...take their belongings and leave quietly; other students who did understand some p...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d manner than just a discussion class. In conclusion, I believe that the lectur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, frankly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 377.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12201591512 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06004011749 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570291777188 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8075737167 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9444444444 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61111111111 5.45110844103 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298499037147 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921621527677 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381164135769 0.0737576698707 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178022980885 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571377538077 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.