Sometimes it is better to be dishonest with people than to always tell them the truth.
It is of great importance for people to have healthy relationships in society. To maintain a relationship, trust must be built, and trust is formed when people are honest with each other. It appears that most people agree that people should be always honest. I have the same opinion with respect to the issue for two reasons, I will explorer in the following essay.
First and foremost, the majority of individuals would agree with the notion that lying could cause unintended and unexpected problems. In other words, it is better to be honest for preventing negative side effects. To illustrate more thoroughly, doctors must tell the truth to their patients. Doctors should be more precise, especially in critical cases where patients have a disease that can cause death. For instance, patients, who have a short period of life, need time to organize their surroundings. They have to prepare for death, leaving a will and meeting people have not seen in a long time. It also takes time to accept death. Based on these considerations and examples, I am certain that doctors must be honest when they explain a result of a diagnosis to their patients.
Furthermore, a single lie can result in unfavorable and adverse ramifications to relationships. Some people sometimes prefer being dishonest to being honest for maintaining good relationships but it would be a cause of breaking relationships. My own experience is a concrete example of this. When I was a freshman in a university, I tried to keep healthy relationships with my friends. one day, I was in a situation that I had to decide to be dishonest to my friend for refusing his request with no offense. however, he noticed that I lied and asked me why I was not honest with him. After that incident, My relationship with him became awkward. This experience has taught me that it is important not to lie.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that people must be always honest. This is because lying causing problems and affecting a negative effect on relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is of great importance for people to ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will explorer in the following essay. First and foremost, the majority of indi...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 788, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esult of a diagnosis to their patients. Furthermore, a single lie can result in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... healthy relationships with my friends. one day, I was in a situation that I had to...
^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...r refusing his request with no offense. however, he noticed that I lied and asked me wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 714, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ght me that it is important not to lie. In conclusion, I firmly believe that peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a negative effect on relationships.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92397660819 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94380992832 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8345236143 48.9658058833 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.5454545455 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5454545455 20.6045352989 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90909090909 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259523635673 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709215076262 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726658976047 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154585705698 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353718453197 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 11.7677419355 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.