Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do. Use reasons and examples to support your position.
Without any shadow of a doubt, in these competitive marketplaces, group projects are vital to meet success and get blossom. Group Members' characteristics and managing approach of a group are the most influential factors to fulfill the projects in the best way. One of the controversial considerations when a group want to absorb a new person is that weather a person must be obedient or otherwise. Even though many individuals are of the opinion that the former people are more beneficial for a group, but, I, personally, subscribe to this idea that second type of people, those that commonly persist on their point of view which is different from group line guide, bring more favorable results. Such a person bring groups new idea and more active atmosphere.
In first place, if we want to see galloping rate of progress in our tasks and effectively deal with it, we would be full of great new ideas by which we are able to reconsider the possible problems and apply new conviction through doing task. Given this consideration for a group project, collaborate with creative people who always have new idea is vital. It is not to mention that such an individual will not follow every request given by groups inasmuch as always they have their own opinions and often insist on them. If members of a group be obedient, the level of progress and growth among them would be restricted because all of them probably follow just a few members' perspective which is narrow and limited. For instance, I used to be in two different groups, one when I worked in an environmental researching group with the goal of finding a recycling process for cities' garbage, and another one was when I hired in a recycled plastic material production company. In first work place, the group's manager was a person who was intentionally looking forward obedient members, subsequently individuals in the group always work like a robot which had to be given tasks with exact guide line, in fact they weren’t active-mind person at all. After a while, this group disintegrated because they bothered from lack of innovative and new useful ideas, and following failed in competition with their counterparts. In contrast, in my second work place where I was able to increase my knowledge was really open to new ideas. Their managers were always hungry for innovative and disobedient individuals since they were aware of such a vital characteristic among groups. It wasn’t lasted long to be a well-known company with its non-stopped progresses, and eventually this company sit in first rank of its counterparts' companies.
Secondly, it is crystal clear that human beings need to use his knowledge and experiences in order to feel sense of usefulness, only by which they can be stimulated people who are helpful and profitable an any work place. Group project if was not in the stronger demand of such a person in comparison in other situations, they will be equal ones. In otherwise of this situation, when people think their knowledge and ideas are not useful, will become disappointed soon, so accordingly they would not do even their simple tasks as good as they can. Afterwards, groups' air will be inactive and died in which not only all person will be affected but also the object of groups will be threatened. For instance, I am a master student in Sharif University, and now I am in one of university's professor's research group. He is very knowledgeable and skillful in his field, but unfortunately he is not a person who is willing towards ideas and thought of his group's members. Everyone who joint to this group even those are very energetic and kin can see inactive atmosphere among members. I, as a one in this group, am searching for alternative research group because otherwise it not only I will make a motionless person but also I cannot be success because of the future failure of his group.
In summary, by all these taken into account, I think a successful group are those that are concerned about the people who are full of idea, not just an obedient person. Such an opinion in my mind come from beyond the price of benefits of such a person like bringing groups new ideas, and inject active and lively soul in a group. Who in his or her right mind can refute the importance of these demands of a group which wanted to be prosperous and success?
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 667, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
... all of them probably follow just a few members perspective which is narrow and limited...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 998, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...ction company. In first work place, the groups manager was a person who was intentiona...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1108, Rule ID: AM_I[1]
Message: Did you mean 'am I'?
Suggestion: am I
...ong members. I, as a one in this group, am searching for alternative research grou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, i think, in contrast, in fact, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 42.0 15.1003584229 278% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 13.8261648746 210% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 100.0 52.1666666667 192% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3605.0 1977.66487455 182% => OK
No of words: 748.0 407.700716846 183% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81951871658 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.22968341894 4.48103885553 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79383330181 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 343.0 212.727598566 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458556149733 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1132.2 618.680645161 183% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2658047222 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.653846154 100.406767564 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7692307692 20.6045352989 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.34615384615 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414140111284 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130930002175 0.076458572812 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703334524362 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.279191932987 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480409267399 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 161.0 86.8835125448 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.