Sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The group will be helped more by person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
By and large, it is of little debate in today’s sophisticated world that team working is of great importance. This is inasmuch as task can be accomplished with a more suitable outcome when they are done within a group. With this in mind, it is quite expected to notice some of its aspects are somewhat controversial due to its prominent standing; many people think that a person who listens to other members’ advice is more helpful in a group, while others contend that a person who is persistent on his ideas which are different to the group’s demands is superior to the other choice. I personally consider myself among the former group. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated in the ensuing lines by giving two outstanding reasons.
First of all, having similar demands helps group attain better results. Needless to say that success in a group relies on how perfect its members can work together. If members have similar ideas, they can work more efficaciously which results in a better outcome. On the other hand, having contradictory ideas make members waste their time on trial and error. To get a most desired result, it is vital that each person expresses his or her ideas; others should consider various ideas but success achieved only if team members agree with a unique procedure.
Another interesting point which deserves some words here is that insisting on an idea makes other members indifference. Many are under the impression that in such groups, members lose their eagerness, and lessen their efforts to complete their tasks on time. Take, for instance, a basketball team in which there is a tough leader who always persists on his plans. Other members who want to play more and think that his ideas are wrong cannot convince him to change his ideas. Therefore, they have to accept his plans and because they do not agree with his plans they lose their self-confidence and as a result the whole team hurts.
To recapitulate, having analyzed the reasoning presented above, and despite various opinions, one can safely conclude that having members who have similar ideas is more fruitful to achieve an appropriate outcome. This is owing to the fact that members may lose their eagerness and confidence by one inconvincible member.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'members'' or 'member's'?
Suggestion: members'; member's
...s that insisting on an idea makes other members indifference. Many are under the impres...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, by and large, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9842519685 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67656572977 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551181102362 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 618.680645161 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.1028197021 48.9658058833 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.705882353 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269178999701 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827636129486 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542669730676 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156260882334 0.150856017488 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0928579512493 0.0645574589148 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.