To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
By and large, it is of little debate in today’s sophisticated era that each society has its unique characteristics. Developing constantly throughout the history, each city has provided its inhabitants with ample opportunities to establish their exceptional society. Due to their distinctive characteristics each society should be studied separately. With this in mind, it is quite expected to notice some of its aspects are somewhat controversial due to its prominent standing; many wonder what way is more fruitful in understanding the societies’ features. One idea of prominence in this regard is that studying the societies’ major cities is mandatory to understand its most paramount aspects. I personally agree with the statement to some extent. The rationale behind this thesis will be elaborated in the ensuing lines by giving some outstanding reasons.
First of all, although it seems reasonable that prevailing cultural characteristics of a particular society are originated from its major cities, one should consider that in today’s communicational era in which information is available everywhere, major towns imitate common features without any efforts. Therefore, large cities around the world have similar features. In order to get sufficient explicit knowledge, an avid researcher must contemplate other cities rather than only major ones in her study. Many people living in major cities had to migrate to there for many reasons. Having moved to their new living town, they brought new customs to large cities. This demonstrates that many cultural attributes are originated from rural or smaller areas, and these traditions change in the new environment when people migrate to larger cities. Thus, it is vital for researchers to look into minor cities beside major ones.
Another interesting point which deserves some words here is that major towns have their unique features that need special attention in every investigation. A comprehensive understanding about a particular society cannot be achieved only if major cities’ characteristics are included. No one can ignore these cities’ role in developing a society’s features. Take New York as an example. People living in this mega town have some distinguished attributes that other American people are bereft of such characteristics. In such circumstances it is impossible to ignore those influential cities from investigations.
To recapitulate, having analyzed the reasoning presented above, and despite various opinions surrounding this issue, one can safely conclude that considering both major and minor towns are necessary in each related study. Both have some unique characteristics which make them important in such investigations. So, in order to conduct a comprehensive study, we can suggest researchers to pay sufficient attention to both major and minor cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 485, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun wonder seems to be countable; consider using: 'many wonders'.
Suggestion: many wonders
...oversial due to its prominent standing; many wonder what way is more fruitful in understand...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, therefore, thus, by and large, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2452.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7023255814 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32607249586 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546511627907 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 796.5 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 61.532231399 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.608695652 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6956521739 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1798824796 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544081208215 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453365996037 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108890598806 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278082773594 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 48.8420337079 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 12.1743820225 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.