Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best? 1. Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics; 2. Help people who cannot afford to build or rent a home to build a house;
3. Visit and assist elderly people with daily tasks.
As a human being, we all like to help other people. Actually, by helping others, not only we aid them about their affairs, but also we feel better ourselves. To answer the proposed question, I try to explain the advantages and drawbacks of each one, and then I conclude my opinion.
The first option is to help students who study in a school in their neighborhood about reading and mathematics. There are many benefits to this plan. First, teaching other students help the university students learn how to teach. Second, they will learn how to interact with school students. Especially, those who want to be a teacher in the future, it would be valuable practice for them. I cannot propose any disadvantages for this plan.
The second option is to help poor people to build or rent a home. It is very helpful for homeless people, but building an apartment cost a fortune. Renting an apartment is another choice, but after a year the poor family should rent the apartment or another place for their residence. Therefore, renting a residual place is not a permanent solution for homeless people.
The third option is to visit and assist elderly people with daily affairs. Elderly people, especially those who don’t live with their children or relatives, need other people to do their personal affairs such as buying groceries. If they live alone, they even get more surprised when others come over and ask their feelings. It also doesn’t cost anything but time for the university students.
To sum it up, the first plan has more privileges than others’, because helping other student is more related to their work (study in the university). They will learn how to teach younger students, and also review mathematics which is a basic course for other courses such as physics. On the other hand, building home for other people needs a lot of money and renting an apartment is not a permanent solution for homeless people. Help elderlies is a good idea, but it is not related to the university students’ work that is studying in a specific field.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89204545455 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64311439764 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2162094198 48.9658058833 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7619047619 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246615162552 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765597627029 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652093914858 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136705963478 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676358790838 0.0645574589148 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 11.7677419355 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.