study in group
Should students work on a group or do extra work to get good scores? This is a controversial question. Some people think that it is better for students to do any extra work on their own because that would save them time. Although I understand their point of view, I wholeheartedly believe that working on a group is advantegous for students for several conspicuous reasons.
One of the reasons why students should work in a group is becasue it tremendously helps students to improve their communication skills. For example, let us say there is a girl who just has started high school. She has a shy personality, she does not like to talk to people around her. Soon after she started; her teacher asgined her into a group. In order for students to earn good scores, they need to do well by participating in the group's activites, and bounce ideas back and forth. Eventaully, the teenager girl started to reduce her shyness, and she become an eloquent speaker. If she does not participated in the group, her teacher will not give her high grads, and she probably continue to have her timited personality. Although people do not believe that group assingments have a tremendous effect in young people, it actually does. Because of this, it is better for students to work in a group.
Another reason for working in a group is that students will have a chance to broaden their horizon. Research has been done on 1500 students in the Seattle School distct about the benefit that students gain when they work in groups. 70% of the participants stated that they were able to meet new frineds from different clutures and backgrounds and learned from them. So the data shows that when people participate in group activites such as doing homework or assignments together, they get know about each others' norms. Although students sometimes are busy and do not have time to chat with group's members, having an opportunity to work together will open new windeos for them and they might make friendship. If students choise to do the homework that is given by teachers alone, they would not be able to extent the social relationships. Thus, it is obvious that working as group is worthwhile idea.
To sum up, teachers should push the students to work in groups. This is beause not only it helps students to learn a new skill such as communication, but also it provides them a good opportunities to extend their social relationships.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'participate'
Suggestion: participate
...me an eloquent speaker. If she does not participated in the group, her teacher will not give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'continues'.
Suggestion: continues
...t give her high grads, and she probably continue to have her timited personality. Althou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are sometimes
...ut each others norms. Although students sometimes are busy and do not have time to chat with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'opportunity'?
Suggestion: opportunity
...ation, but also it provides them a good opportunities to extend their social relationships.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, thus, well, while, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78758949881 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71416945719 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508353221957 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0381046475 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.59090909091 5.45110844103 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154164848972 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624687835697 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607087088872 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0929646036233 0.150856017488 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585866435105 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.