For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children(five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Nowadays the importance of education and methods of teaching has gotten lucid to everyone. In this regard, there is a controversial question asking whether the proper time for training is in universities or schools when the kids are five to ten years old. I am afraid, I disagree with the opinion which is expressing the best time for devoting a budget for teaching to improve the country is when the people are at the age of less than 10 and more than 5. The reasons to substantiate my idea is explored in the following.
First of all, children at an early age do not have enough ability to remember the most major parts of a lesson. To put on the other hand, the people in that period need playing and getting familiar with some facts of living. After all, when they have enough experience to face the difficulties of the real world, the state could strongly subsidize them to enhance the country. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my little brother who went to special kindergarten. In that place, he had to study math and the English language, which was so hard and soon for him. the kindergarten funded by the commander of the city and was particular. After a while, while he was preparing for going to a new level, he gradually found he is losing his information and could remember just a simple portion of them. This example demonstrates investing and compelling young boys and girls is not a good decision for elevating the condition of a nation/
Second, not knowing about the interests in the future is another reason for managers to devote money in academia, not in schools of kids. To be specific, the leader has a responsibility to make ways of reaching goals for all persons who are aware of their dreams and wishes. Surely, youth in college and research institute realize the help of the governments and the money, however, the kids do not understand this issue and require to seek for their route. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home. A year ago, I and some of my friend had to go to schools and learned the students how to program a computer, the government supported us for the job. The plan was totally unsuccessful due to the children of those schools did not know what they want and just try the classes. If the government had spent that money on universities, the budget would not waste.
By and large, I do believe funding schools of children is not a good choice. Since they cannot use the much sections of lessons, tomorrow also they have not find their way for the later.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'improving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'teach' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: improving
...time for devoting a budget for teaching to improve the country is when the people are at t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 574, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ge, which was so hard and soon for him. the kindergarten funded by the commander of...
^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seeking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: seeking
...o not understand this issue and require to seek for their route. A personal experience ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... good choice. Since they cannot use the much sections of lessons, tomorrow also they...
^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'found'.
Suggestion: found
...of lessons, tomorrow also they have not find their way for the later.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, after all, as to, by and large, first of all, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2080.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 455.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57142857143 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61295852014 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551648351648 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 11.0 3.08781362007 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1060457145 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246948312853 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594215922824 0.076458572812 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553782050277 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133880169745 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.067425340006 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.