A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge
of the subject being taught.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Teachers have a vital role in development of students intellect and knowledge. They are the models for students and it is a well known fact that if teachers explained something to student then they argue with their parents also that what teacher says I will follow that. In Indian tradition , teacher is always been respected as god and asked to follow them. I am of the conviction that instead of deepest knowledge of the subject , teachers should have the quality of relating well with students.i believe this due to some reasons which I will discuss further in my essay.
First of all , Communication with the teacher is very important in the class, passive teaching and listening end up with no comprehension to the students and there is no relation of teacher with student than ,it end up with boring and snoozing lullaby. If teacher know how to reach astudent than s/he can find out the problems with the students and make the teaching more effective and understandable.
Secondly, if student finds the teacher enjoyable and friendly then they will also find the most boring ecture as the most interesting. It’s the art of teacher to make the lecture interesting even the topic is boring.
It is widely ,accepted that interactive lessons are more understandable as compared to the passive lectures. So, I believe that relating with the students, communicating with them, making friendly milieu in the class are necessary ground works to build the statue of knowledge and it is art of teacher to create this. So, relating with student is must haves for teachers as compared to deepest knowledge of subject.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... I will follow that. In Indian tradition , teacher is always been respected as god...
^^
Line 1, column 396, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the deepest'.
Suggestion: of the deepest
...em. I am of the conviction that instead of deepest knowledge of the subject , teachers sho...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tead of deepest knowledge of the subject , teachers should have the quality of rel...
^^
Line 1, column 498, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... quality of relating well with students.i believe this due to some reasons which ...
^
Line 2, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...scuss further in my essay. First of all , Communication with the teacher is very ...
^^
Line 2, column 208, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...no relation of teacher with student than ,it end up with boring and snoozing lull...
^^
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ends'?
Suggestion: ends
...lation of teacher with student than ,it end up with boring and snoozing lullaby. I...
^^^
Line 2, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... student than ,it end up with boring and snoozing lullaby. If teacher know how to...
^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...even the topic is boring. It is widely ,accepted that interactive lessons are mo...
^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the deepest'.
Suggestion: to the deepest
... is must haves for teachers as compared to deepest knowledge of subject.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 272.0 407.700716846 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72728242423 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 212.727598566 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522058823529 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7805837398 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.181818182 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306654531046 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118195128706 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694554742774 0.0737576698707 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182865282153 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690374620523 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.