Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
It goes without saying that in this progressive and complicated world where we live, education is one of the most important and significant building blocks of society. In this vein, using the best methods to educate students is a long-lasting debate. While some people hold the opinion that teachers can talk about politics and society, others stand at the other side of the continuum, believing that educators should not make their social or political views known in the classroom. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the later idea and the reasons to substantiate my point of view are presented in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, it is crystal clear that learners are affected by their teachers and schools can shape the mind of children. In this line of thought, teachers among their teaching can impose their personal viewpoint on students. To be more specific, the majority of students prefer to hear and follow educators since children rely on teachers' minds and believes. My own experience can drive this notion home. When I was a primary student, my teacher always discussed with students about inflation and unemployment while at that age students can analyze sophisticated dilemmas. As a result, when I came back home after my class, my mind was always preoccupied with issues that my teacher told in classroom. Therefore, I could not enjoy my childhood.
Moreover, it is no secret to anyone learning process is concise and delicate. In fact, if this process does not work properly, it will have a harmful effect for students. In this vein, many scholars need to concentrate on their lessons and they want to use their time accurately. Not only the time is trajectory but also students have to take advantage of their childhood properly. In fact, teachers by telling the story about society and politics can distract students' concentration in the class. As a result, learners feel boring in the class and also they have to put more effort into so as to compensate for their losing time in school.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons into account, I believe that teachers should not talk about society and politics in their class not only it causes to make students worry but also it is a kind of waste of time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'learns'.
Suggestion: learns
...d. Moreover, it is no secret to anyone learning process is concise and delicate. In fac...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... also they have to put more effort into so as to compensate for their losing time in sch...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...itics in their class not only it causes to make students worry but also it is a kind of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90600522193 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71414160219 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543080939948 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6645160843 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.388888889 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2777777778 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359732559563 0.236089414692 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947105797492 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104427030821 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215748090403 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644198030618 0.0645574589148 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.