These days, people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations. Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them. What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time?
Going to a museum
Joining a guided tour of popular attractions
Visiting a popular shopping area
Talking to a local resident
Watching a local television station
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Do not use memorized examples.
It is critically important to gain enough information about the place to which people travel for the first time. Personally, I believe that talking to local citizen will the most essential and effective way to understand the situation of the particular area. I feel this way for two main reasons, and I will develop these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs.
To begin with, people will be available to comprehend the truth about an unfamiliar place by getting in touch with native resident. Most countries and service facilities tend to conceal their disadvantage in order to be appreciated, which will lead me to draw the facile and incomplete conclusion about the whole region. On the other hand, an individual who experienced a lot of things about the area will probably tell the truth of advantages and disadvantages of the place. My personal history is a compelling example of this. Last year, I went to downtown of the countryside of my country for the first time. I have traveled around different places, and thought that the place was pleasant because things I have seen was nearly perfect. However, when I asked the indigenous denizen about the condition of a suburb, he stated that things are totally different and relentless. Therefore, I went to see the circumstances of the suburb because his statement seems incredible compared to matters that I have seen. Unfortunately, my understanding about the area was completely changed as soon as I see impoverished life condition of the slum. If I had not communicated with the person who lives there, I would not understand the complete situation comprehensively.
Secondly, native people’s perspective may help tourists to comprehend the country’s culture and unique value. When individuals travel to unfamiliar country, things may not sense to them by virtue of some difference between the country and their own nation. However, if they receive additional explanations or understanding from the people from the specific area, their comprehension will absolutely improve. For instance, three years ago, I traveled to Beijing, a hectic city of China. During my travel, I saw a boy eating insects, then I thought that he was eating this because he could not afford other types of food. Afterwards, I told a Chinese man about what I saw in their nation. Fortunately, he told me that insect is their common cuisine, which truly helped me to understand that the boy who was eating insect was not impoverished but usual. Hence, I could understand their culture correctly thanks to chitchat with a native citizen.
In summation, I am of the opinion of that when people go to see new places, talking to people living there will be beneficial for them. This is because individuals will understand the underlying truth, comprehend difference of culture, and valuable advice from well-informed others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ese ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, people will be available ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the complete situation comprehensively. Secondly, native people’s perspective ma...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i feel, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2395.0 1977.66487455 121% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12847965739 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99430808399 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518201284797 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0691007228 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.130434783 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3043478261 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91304347826 5.45110844103 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197779106441 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591108363288 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057980403993 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13639422339 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378266665101 0.0645574589148 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.