TPO 18-Do you agree or disagree? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.
Over the past few decades, the issue of wheter students are more influenced y their teachers rather than their friends has received a great deal of attention from psychologists and parents. Although some may argue that teachers are more reliable for students and they can follow their reliefs, I aswell as many others believe that students are more affected by their friends. I am of the opinion that both of these viewpoints have theiir own merits and drwabacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremoest, without the shadow of doubt, children always hang out with their friends. This means that in order to participating more time with each other they can be be more influencable even than their parents. Seeing other every morning in school, students can make strongly relationships with other students. Therefore, they can affect each other more than anyone. As a case of point, considering a group of students which study together. By doing this work, they can pesuade theirselfs to more practicing and more persevering and their influence on together is more than their teacher.
Furthermore, it has established beyond the doubt that people would comminucating and with someone who have in common and have more same interests. Students, like other people all around the world, choose their friends by their interests and their age. The more they have in common, the more their relationship get strong. Due to having a strong relationship, It as claimed that students can influence their partenrship interests' and due to having the same age they can understands their problems more than parents and teachers. According to a research which conducted by a Japanese psychology institute, students which have a group friends frequently exhibit the same behavior on specific situations.
In brief, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, one can draw the conclusion that student friends' are more effective than their teachers cheifly due to the spending more times with friends and influeceblity of the same age people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | wuttichai.v | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | nusybah | 65 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | neiky.verdura | 90 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | marysv | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | marysv | 73 | view |
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors (not mine) 70
- TPO22-Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom (not mine) 73
- TPO17- decreasing the birds population 80
- Communal encyclopedias vs. online encyclopedias 66
- Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...ting more time with each other they can be be more influencable even than their paren...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'understand'
Suggestion: understand
...and due to having the same age they can understands their problems more than parents and te...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, so, therefore, well, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 331.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30513595166 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82956602659 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531722054381 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1845443275 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.066666667 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394582819239 0.236089414692 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15771416096 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11520628334 0.0737576698707 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27401963292 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608392783576 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.