Social relationship has attracted much social concern. Some specialists believe that the most important consideration in any relation is always telling the truth. Personally, I bear in mind a strong agreement on this belief.
On the one hand, what has been put under consideration is relationship bonding. The fact is that always telling truths is a method to express honest concerns for someone. Therefore, it creates chances for people to deliver the message of consideration to others like their friends, colleagues, etc. As a result, people are supposed to be more appreciate and show more affection to each others. Consequently, being honest in any circumstance plays a crucial role in stimulating the stability of any relationship. More importantly, it cannot be denied that always being a straightforward person posses a large probability for people to voice out their thought about anything. It leads to the fact that there is a likelihood for them to be aware of difficulties in life, desires or even characters of others and also get the sympathy feelings from their friends. On that ground, needless to say, it is possible for people to build up the belief in their friendship, which is the base for a durable relation. As a consequence, they are certain to make progress in fortify the cohesion of their friends relationship. By and large, always prioritizing the truth is a better idea for everyone.
On the other hand, some people might say that telling truths can severely frustrate other people. Accordingly, it sets a serious damage on any relationship. However, it is just applicable to a minority. It is widely known that communication is very complex but people always try to make the most effective and appropriate expression with others. Hence, they are able to both follow the truth and put everything under control. Furthermore, by telling the truth, people stand a golden chances to go through difficult situations as they risk showing the truths to others. Correspondingly, it is apparent that people tend to be filled with confident feelings which encourages them to be more courageous in their lives. This, in turn, forms a significant contribution to promote people to take over other obstacles in their associations such as conflicts or misunderstanding. Subsequently, it is more easy for them to maintain the balance in their social relationships. Beyond any doubt, the idea that always showing the truth extremely damage human relationship is possible to end in collapse.
In a word, all factors mentioned above are evidences supporting my agreement. It is highly recommended that everyone should take my writing into careful consideration to make an suitable decision on interacting with other people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s relationship bonding. The fact is that always telling truths is a method to exp...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers like their friends, colleagues, etc. As a result, people are supposed to be m...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'serious damage'.
Suggestion: serious damage
...rate other people. Accordingly, it sets a serious damage on any relationship. However, it is jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 766, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urn, forms a significant contribution to promote people to take over other obstac...
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ting into careful consideration to make an suitable decision on interacting with o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, such as, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22675736961 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15122587993 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528344671202 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3050988472 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.64 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.56 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 11.8709677419 168% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214919186208 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064087838263 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707971944159 0.0737576698707 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144711481372 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0603784125764 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.