TPO-30 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.Use specifi

Essay topics:

TPO-30 - Independent Writing Task

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours.

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Enjoying the job that you are doing is very important because it is the key to be successful in that job. Some people thinks it is more enjoyable to work three days in a week for long hours than working five days in a week for shorter hours. I do not agree with that statement for few reasons which I write them in this article.

First, working for long hours can make the doer of the job very tired because you have fresh energy to do the job just for few hours and it is very unlikely to do the job well if you do not have energy to finish it. For example, when someone starts the work on the early morning and continue working for six or seven hours with just short brakes, the productivity is going to decrease and at the end the person wants to sleep at his or her desk to take some rest.

Second, if you work for short hours you have more time to spend on your hobbies each day. Maybe you want to watch your favorite show on a certain day, but if you work for long hours, the show may be broadcast while you are working, so you miss the show. when you do not like your job, working for fewer hours allows you to do your favorite tasks every day and bring more joy to the day because you do not feel that the day have been wasted completely.

Third, visiting your workplace for more days can connect the employee to the job better than going to the job just for few days because you may have some co-worker there that you like to talk to and have a chat with that person every day, but working for long hours in just three day won't give the workers enough time to talk about what they like or what have happened the last night. Basically, seeing the co-workers often times, makes stronger connection between them which bring more fun to the environment of the workplace.

So, I mentioned three reasons for supporting the statement that working in five days for shorter hours is more fun because you feel less tired at the end of the job, and more time is available when you want to do your daily tasks; besides that, it gives more opportunities to you to make a stronger and happier connection between yourself and the co-workers.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Enjoying the job that you are doing is v...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which I write them in this article. First, working for long hours can make t...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t his or her desk to take some rest. Second, if you work for short hours you ...
^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... you are working, so you miss the show. when you do not like your job, working for f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the day have been wasted completely. Third, visiting your workplace for more ...
^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the environment of the workplace. So, I mentioned three reasons for suppor...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.28255528256 4.8611393121 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0947354532 2.67179642975 78% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 212.727598566 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.425061425061 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 525.6 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.1344086022 184% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.2324470551 48.9658058833 199% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.454545455 100.406767564 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.6045352989 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535848363096 0.236089414692 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.251071247354 0.076458572812 328% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122797642579 0.0737576698707 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360351685632 0.150856017488 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822859495543 0.0645574589148 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 11.7677419355 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.1575268817 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.14 10.9000537634 75% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 86.8835125448 48% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.0537634409 167% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
No. of Words: 408 while No. of Different Words: 162

---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 408 350
No. of Characters: 1701 1500
No. of Different Words: 162 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.494 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.169 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.046 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 76 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 61 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.926 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.459 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.722 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.333 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5