TPO 36: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The development of science and technology has propelled life styles to a great extent. There are plenty of projects people have to do in a limited time. The question is whether performing the projects one by one or all together. Although many may have the opinion that account for the time limitation it is better to provide all of the projects together, I have an opposed view that finishing them one by one is the great job. My main reasons to hold this point are concentration, efficiency and result, explained in this essay.
As a threshold matter, people are not capable of doing two or more different things at the same time due to the fact that their mind can not handle all of them. Therefore, the level of concentration diminishes magnificently while people are performing two varied projects simultaneously. For instance, an engineer whose job is instructing buildings can not concentrate on two important tower projects as each of them has many details considering each of which at the same time seems impossible.
Furthermore, all projects could not be implemented efficiently unless they start successively. Mistakes arose as the consequence of complex projects coinciding each other, fixing each of which consumes a long time. In addition, many critical features of projects would be denied because of perplex working condition. I remember one of my school courses which had two projects on diverse topics. In spite of a long term we had, I ignored to do it early so it remained until the end of the semester when I mixed up many aspects of these two projects and finally it took me longer time to provide them.
Last but not least, those projects performed separately bring about perfect accomplishments rather than the projects done together. Obviously, this is the most essential part of any project to end up in a best way and provide appropriate results. Even though some people are only satisfied with the number of projects they have finished, the most valued projects are those ended in the best expected quality. As an instance, there are authors whose poor content books are published monthly, whereas precious masterpieces are provided through a long period of time, even in a decade. It is the quality that makes sense, not the number.
In conclusion, implementing projects simultaneously does not provide good outcomes as concentration and efficiency are declined and the result is not flawless. People have better finish a project completely and then begin a fresh one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun may seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much may', 'a good deal of may'.
Suggestion: much may; a good deal of may
...ts one by one or all together. Although many may have the opinion that account for the t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...time limitation it is better to provide all of the projects together, I have an opposed vi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach of them has many details considering each of which at the same time seems imp...
^^
Line 4, column 204, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ential part of any project to end up in a best way and provide appropriate result...
^
Line 4, column 550, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...asterpieces are provided through a long period of time, even in a decade. It is the quality th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in spite of, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2088.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 416.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01923076923 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89229346739 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548076923077 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1209878929 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313507943849 0.236089414692 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995329247648 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630910857931 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183273060206 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249922585338 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.