TPO 41 Do you agree or disagree with following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

TPO 41- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

It stands to reason that being a teacher is an absolutely essential job in any society because a teacher can nurture beneficial persons who have positive effects on their society or even on the world. In spite of their significance, in today's world, I think that teachers are less appreciated by individuals than in the past. I provide two main reasons for supporting my viewpoint hereunder.

The first and foremost reason why I think so is that teachers were the only means to teach eager people new lessons in the past. Both the number of teachers and alternative means for learning were extremely scarce some years ago, with the result that teachers were treated in a respective and esteemed manner in the past. Nowadays, in contrast, there are a large number of new means for learning and education such as online programs, educational videos, and didactic software, resulting in a decline in the demand for teachers. On the other side, an increase in the number of teachers causes a low level of accessibility to teachers to lessen, and therefore the esteemed status of teachers decreases.

Another reason is that there are more educated people in the present-day world. In my view, the more educated people become, the less they appreciate their elementary teachers. This is because erudite and scholarly people think they are more knowledgeable than their former teachers in their schools. It is evident that the number of educated people in today’s world increases in comparison with the past, so teachers are taken for granted nowadays.

In conclusion, with all this taken into account, I do unfortunately subscribe to the view that teachers are taken for granted today on account of the existence of both more new means to teach and more learned people as compared to the past. In addition, I wish people all around the world would realize that they are on the wrong track and regard teachers as a more priceless resource in their society.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...ds to reason that being a teacher is an absolutely essential job in any society because a teacher ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... past. Nowadays, in contrast, there are a large number of new means for learning and education su...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 210, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ore new means to teach and more learned people as compared to the past. In addition, I...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in my view, in spite of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96048632219 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68684756918 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483282674772 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 512.1 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.5058435895 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250354038033 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096643940277 0.076458572812 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572610016486 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153710713132 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132537895249 0.0645574589148 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.