TPO-41: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

TPO-41: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

education and educators are the most important subjects and members of a society. teachers are directly influence on children, juveniles, teenagers and even adults so the future of a community has a close relationship with educators. Some people believe that teachers are not praised and valuable by the society than the past but in my view, this notion is not precise enough and I really believe that passionate teachers of a society are taken into account precious treasures of community in support of two reasons.

first, I think that parents and students are able to discriminate a passionate teacher whose purpose is education and learning and a teacher who wants to earn money by means of teaching as a usual job. hopefully, the validity of the first one is not negligible and people acclaim these teachers any time. For example, I had a very enthusiastic professor in my master degree university. he was very knowledgeable and patient simultaneously. he answered all the questions one by one without escaping from answering. he was always praised by students, other professors and even strangers. In the same time, I had a very different professor for one of my courses with completely reversed characteristics. this person was not a popular person in the university even with a noticeable scientific background. As a result I think that interested teachers are still valuable and appreciated.

Second, people understand that, if they consider teachers occupation priceless, the teachers consider students valuable too. It is a chain and the interactions will be effective on the future of children and subsequently the future of the society. Thus, educators are always taken into account precious members of a society.

Overally, I disagree with people who are doubtful about validity of teachers and I believe that passionate teachers are respectful nowadays not only for importance of their occupation but also for their personality and their manner of teaching.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Education
education and educators are the most important su...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teachers
...tant subjects and members of a society. teachers are directly influence on children, juv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...community in support of two reasons. first, I think that parents and students are ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and students are able to discriminate a passionate teacher whose purpose is educ...
^^
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hopefully
...ey by means of teaching as a usual job. hopefully, the validity of the first one is not n...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ofessor in my master degree university. he was very knowledgeable and patient simu...
^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...owledgeable and patient simultaneously. he answered all the questions one by one w...
^^
Line 3, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he questions one by one without escaping from answering. he was always praised by...
^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...y one without escaping from answering. he was always praised by students, other p...
^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y one without escaping from answering. he was always praised by students, other p...
^^
Line 3, column 704, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...th completely reversed characteristics. this person was not a popular person in the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the future of children and subsequently the future of the society. Thus, educato...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, so, still, thus, for example, i think, as a result, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2523659306 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05233697984 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514195583596 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0641463203 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0625 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.5376344086 217% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121446204116 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334841433966 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361133879101 0.0737576698707 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0759477669472 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300585417537 0.0645574589148 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 58.1214874552 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.