TPO 42- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Career is one of the most important concerns of everyone. The kind of tasks and variety of duties that should be done during a workday is one of the crucial job properties that is considered by most of the people before choosing a career. While some people hold the view that doing a single task during the workday is more appealing for the employee, I believe that employees prefer to do varieties of tasks in a day.
First, malty tasks increase person's tendency to success. In fact, a person becomes more eager for success, if a number of his mistakes stay in acceptable level. The level of concentration of a person during a task has straight relation with the amount of spent time on that task. As the spent time increases, the person's concentration decreases which enhances the chance of making mistakes. Accordingly, a person can retain his mistake in fair level by dividing his workday time to several parts for spending on different tasks. In addition, person's skills are not the same in different area. If a person plans to do a task at which he is not as much as the other tasks expert after doing a task in which he is an expert, it helps him to have a better self-steam and do the job better. Therefore, it will increase his eagerness to gain a better result, since the result of the last tasks helped him to have a better self-steam.
Dividing day for doing several tasks has advantages on person's health. Indeed, some duties force a worker to use some member of his body more than the other parts. Loading force for a long time on specific organ increases the chance of injury on that member. Doing varieties of tasks during a day provides a situation for the worker to distribute force between different parts. To shed light on my point further, let’s assume a machinist who has to work with different machines. Working with milling machines demands to stand during machining that can cause back pain in a long time. However, if the machinist has to do a different task, doing some assembling helps the person to reload the force from his back to his hands. In addition, it helps a person to have a healthier soul and prevent getting depressed. As a matter of fact, the possibility of getting depressed is higher in a person who stays in an unchanged situation for a long time. We can expand this fact to workplace also. For example, if a person does same tasks for several days, he may feel that he works like a machine. This feeling causes depression in him which face his soul health on danger.
In conclusion, I believe that doing several jobs in day’s increases employees’ satisfaction, since it increases their tendency to success and provides benefits on their health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... task. As the spent time increases, the persons concentration decreases which enhances ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...r doing several tasks has advantages on persons health. Indeed, some duties force a wor...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 987, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e. We can expand this fact to workplace also. For example, if a person does same tas...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'kind of', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.268292682927 0.229887763892 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.15009380863 0.158761421928 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0675422138837 0.0866891130778 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0281425891182 0.046263068375 61% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0487804878049 0.0685040099705 71% => OK
Prepositions: 0.15009380863 0.118717715034 126% => OK
Participles: 0.0375234521576 0.0351676179071 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61954511249 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0337711069418 0.0309702414327 109% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.118198874296 0.0887237588012 133% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0112570356473 0.0209618222197 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0168855534709 0.0139019557991 121% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2711.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 478.0 408.028673835 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67154811715 5.86048508987 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.48200974243 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3410041841 0.338922669872 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232217573222 0.251872472559 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15690376569 0.174417080927 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106694560669 0.112833075102 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61954511249 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456066945607 0.524397521467 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.5053853175 59.2087087015 87% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.9166666667 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0921401676 48.84282405 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.958333333 120.699889404 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.5533526081 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.708333333333 0.644075263715 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 43.1384239888 45.7405998639 94% => OK
Elegance: 2.00826446281 1.45489161554 138% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268243421026 0.300154397459 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.131531885129 0.103427244359 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.112604674464 0.0752933317313 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.44702179712 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.192543353781 0.151897553556 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972697748478 0.114077575197 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521561208566 0.0781384742642 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384662648218 0.336927656856 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.132581721954 0.067059652881 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174860475557 0.210909579961 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710428645179 0.0618886996521 115% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.75985663082 217% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.6433691756 161% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.