TPO 43
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
--Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
--Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
--Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is not easy for us to point out the mistake of the leader or the teacher because it might hurt the feeling of them. I admit that there are many opinions about this; however, we should correct their mistakes with no hesitation, in my opinion. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explain in the following essay.
To begin with, we can present our knowledge and skills by pointing out the mistake. In the lecturer, teachers often make mistakes even though they are familiar with the topic. Many students are reluctant to point out the mistake because they often assume that it may harm their reputation by the teacher. However, for the point of the teachers, they want their students to point out the mistake because they can avoid teaching incorrect content. Besides, the students who correct the mistake can gain some benefits. They can present their skills and knowledge to their teacher. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a freshman at university, I took a physics course. In the lecturer, I noticed the mistake of the teacher's equation on the blackboard, and I pointed out the mistake and corrected that. I was afraid that the teacher would feel awkward; however, he just thanked me and corrected the mistake. Consequently, I could get credit from him and, I could get an A in his class.
Next, we can avoid the unreasonable conclusion of the meeting by correcting the mistake. When we work at a company, there are a lot of meetings. In the meeting, the leader sometimes misunderstands the topic. Of course, whether we should correct the mistake or not is a tough decision. However, it is critical to avoid unreasonable conclusions in the business scene. For example, I work at an electronics company as an engineer. One day, I discussed how to sell our products. I noticed that our team leader misunderstood the meaning of the technical term that our customer often uses. I pointed out the misunderstanding to prevent the misunderstanding of the demand of our customers. Our leader seemed to feel a little ashamed, but we could avoid choosing the incorrect sales strategies.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that we should point out mistakes by the leader or the teacher. This is because it is a great chance to let teachers acknowledge our skills or knowledge, and we can avoid making incorrect choices in the meeting by correcting the mistake.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 66.0 43.0788530466 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1735.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 360.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81944444444 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98911476842 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486111111111 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 548.1 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1691535845 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4347826087 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.652173913 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112434696081 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037704154425 0.076458572812 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415575727139 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893546843497 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420474361134 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.