TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
-Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leade
-Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no shortage of debate that some leaders or teachers offer something wrong in meeting. the controversial question which arises here is how we can correct the materials that teachers provide? some people believe that it is beneficial that talk about the problem after the class, and others say that we can say nothing about it. As far as I am concerned, it is rational to interrupt the presentation as soon as possible, and correct the mistake. I feel this way for two main reason which will be explored in the following paragraphs.
First of all, one should take into account the fact that when we decide to interrupt the meeting we actually prevent the misunderstanding that some people will be encountered with. In other word, if we lead that our teacher continues about that issue, it can be detrimental because in this way we deceive all people who join the meeting. As a result, they utilize that notion in their live and never see any consequence of that. my own experience is a compelling answer. when I was a freshman I had environmental courses that was about the most effective ways to save our energy. our teacher provides plenty of explainations and one of them was incorrect. Unfortunately, my project was about ideas that was wrong and no one never tried to aware the teacher about his felatious notion. Thus, I could not complete my project since I use wrong information about my speciments. this example demonstrate how its effect when no one propose an incorrect idea imediatelly.
The second remarkable reason is that when we hesitate to mention the misleading idea it can be time consuming. Several days later when our teacher understand that he provided wrong idea he has to hold one meeting again to talk about it, and use some details to explain it properly. Moreover, some people maybe not eager enough to join again because they do not have plenty of time. In contrast, when we alter our teacher notion we have enough time to learn other issues. for example, I was worked as an intern for local magazine in our neighbor. Every week we had meeting with our leader to manage our tasks. In one of the meeting he talked about something that I felt that is wrong, but never suggested it. consequently, when our leader realized that about his mistake he held another meeting, yet most of the employee did not present on that because they respect to their time and never wanted to waste that. Had I proposed the wrong idea, we would not have thought the second meeting is time consuming.
In conclusion, I strongly believe when we perceive wrong idea we have to resolve it again in the middle of the meeting because we can prevent that some people lure and exert wrong idea in their life because when it can be time consuming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...chers offer something wrong in meeting. the controversial question which arises her...
^^^
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...ct the materials that teachers provide? some people believe that it is beneficial th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... and never see any consequence of that. my own experience is a compelling answer. ...
^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... own experience is a compelling answer. when I was a freshman I had environmental co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “when” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... own experience is a compelling answer. when I was a freshman I had environmental co...
^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Our
...most effective ways to save our energy. our teacher provides plenty of explaination...
^^^
Line 5, column 875, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... wrong information about my speciments. this example demonstrate how its effect when...
^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...have enough time to learn other issues. for example, I was worked as an intern for ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, thus, as to, for example, i feel, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 33.0 11.0286738351 299% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 85.0 43.0788530466 197% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2288.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7175257732 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58845758283 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468041237113 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 721.8 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0027584031 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2083333333 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105479531854 0.236089414692 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383113626041 0.076458572812 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340165070015 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775170786487 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567882787616 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.