TPO 55 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
In this progressive and sophisticated world, the way people can communicate for different purposes has changed dramatically. Nowadays, people can communicate through the Internet besides the traditional way of communication, face-to-face interaction. A controversial question that is often raised in this regard is that whether face-to-face communication is better for producing a successful project or connecting through e-mail is more effective. While some people are inclined towards the idea that it is better for classmates and colleagues to communicate in person when working on projects, others, on the other hand, are against this idea. As far as I am concerned, I am of the opinion that the advantages of face-to-face meetings for producing successful results are immense and indisputable. In the following paragraph, I will delve into some reasons and examples justifying my point of view.
The first obvious and compelling reason that shows the communicating through e-mail is not an effective substitute for communicating in person is that in this way, group members can learn from others' achievements. In fact, participating in a real meeting gives everyone a perfect opportunity to share their viewpoints, and evaluate their assigned goals from different perspectives. Therefore, each member has the chance to figure out the weaknesses and strengths of their own tasks. For instance, I remember, once I was asked to prepare a proper design for Iranian houses, for weeks I was wandering around helplessly, after attending group meetings regularly, my co-workers' viewpoint's help me to come up with a new idea and accomplish my task.
Another exquisite point to be mentioned is that this approach will reduce the risk of making big mistakes, misunderstanding, and misinterpreting information and goals. To make it more apparent, as human beings we cannot always rely on our own knowledge and wisdom to make a logical decision, asking other people can help us find our flaws and prevent disastrous consequences. For example, one of my colleagues who work through telecommuting was fired because of a huge mistake of calculating the wrong data. If he had communicated in meetings in person, he would not been made redundant because other members of the group would realize his mistakes.
To summarize, from what has been discussed above, it is crystal clear that the merits of communicating face to face when working on projects are myriad. First, people can learn from their colleagues and classmates by discussing their viewpoints analyzing the task from different perspectives. Besides, this way will decline the chance of making mistakes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decline the chance of making mistakes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40240963855 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21220636095 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556626506024 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 693.9 618.680645161 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6077543043 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.882352941 100.406767564 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187763557459 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607981439472 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513624692774 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111569242238 0.150856017488 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522729053057 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 11.7677419355 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.