In order to lead a gratifying job in this fast-paced modernized world, individuals need to have noticeable skills. There has been no shortage of debates among scholars on whether individuals who have various skills are more likely to prosper or people who put all their effort on just one skill. I vehemently cling to the notion that knowing multiple skill can pave the way of success. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two of my most prominent reasons for advocating this viewpoint.
First and foremost, science and technology has become significantly complex and individuals not only need to gain a profound comprehension of their field, but also they need to gain a comprehensive insight of other majors and fields as well. You can't find a satisfactory job by just knowing one skill. Today's industry demands workers with multiple skills. A person who has great knowledge just about one subject, is less likely to be able to solve the contemporary adversities. On the other hand, an individual who has been studying other fields, is able to examine the problem from different perspectives. For instance, an engineer who works in mechatronics needs to obtain considerable knowledge in electronics and mechanics in order to be able to solve problems in his profession.
Furthermore, another equally compelling reason for corroborating my stance lies in the fact that companies always try to employ industrious people, and it's crystal clear that individuals who have different skills are hard-working individuals and they're of great use. Therefore, having multiple skills paves the way for success. In this hectic modern era you need to compete with millions of people over a well-paid job and having various abilities can make you distinguishable among other candidates. My personal example is a compelling illustration of this. After graduation, my friend and I applied for a job in a laboratory. Both of us were qualified for the position, but I knew how to work with a few more software, and this made me suitable for the job.
To put it all in a nutshell, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly believe that individuals with different expertise are more likely to prosper, on the ground that today's society demands workers with a large variety of abilities, and this would increase your chance of employment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...of other majors and fields as well. You cant find a satisfactory job by just knowing...
^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...skills are hard-working individuals and theyre of great use. Therefore, having multipl...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...e likely to prosper, on the ground that todays society demands workers with a large va...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12919896641 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01857673645 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552971576227 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.2991290476 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.764705882 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7647058824 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226123037394 0.236089414692 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701702407954 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555276178081 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140497941885 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362689070391 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.