TPO33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether teachers should define projects for individual students or team work has received a great deal of attention from parents and educational experts. Although some may argue that some of the students always put their task on the other member of the group and they do not participate in team work duties, I as well as many others believe that team works projects have numerous advantagous for students on their either social behavior or sights. I am of the opinion that both of the viewpoints have their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanations will further elaborate on this perspective.
First an foremost, a paramount reason why students should participate in team works to do their projects is that group working play a crucial role in society. By attending in some team works, students could learn to do group working which in turn can be helpful fo them. In addition, they could learn that each member of the group has a specific duty which should be done accurately. As a result, they can be more ready for their future carreer due to the fact that most of the occupations are done by contributing in a complex team work. Take google company as an example, this company has been established by a large number of team works systems. It is axiomatic that if one of its team does not work correctly, the fame of the company might confront to a great danger.
A further reason for this view is that students who contributing in team works could be more tolerated on cantrary opinions. This means that, they should work on a project which every individual has a ditinct viewsight about it. When they complete their team projects, they would be more familiar with different viewpoints. It is occasionally said that people who have a wide perspective on different issues are more successful than the others due to the reason that they can investigate the issues comprehensevly.
On the other hand, some experts believe that team work projects migh have negative effects on students. It is sometimes said that team work could cause strife among member of the project due to the reason that they could not negotiate on the same sight. However, the team work could enhance the ability of students to do their tasks, some students might put their works on the other member of the group and do not pay attention to their duties as a member of a group.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned resons, I can draw the conclusion that team work projects are more beneficial for students chiefly due to the reason that this desicion not only improve their responsibility but also provides a platform to meet different comments about the same problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...l experts. Although some may argue that some of the students always put their task on the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...laborate on this perspective. First an foremost, a paramount reason why studen...
^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...e, this company has been established by a large number of team works systems. It is axiomatic tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, in brief, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2255.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82869379015 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64268806174 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45182012848 0.524837075471 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.9169836149 48.9658058833 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.647058824 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4705882353 20.6045352989 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305877573538 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116850737712 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510041755071 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194516757453 0.150856017488 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353988119704 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 58.1214874552 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 10.9000537634 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.