TPO42- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Since the dawn of the humanity, human beings have been engaged in a great struggle to improve their life quality by working in an efficient way. In today's modern world which we are emerging from, however, there is a heated debate among work experts as to whether workers should deal with a wide variety of jobs during a day or handling just one duty. I, personally, subscribe to the idea that the workers should deal with a wide range of responsibilities in a workday for a couple of reasons which are elaborated upon hereunder.
There is famous proverb which says, "Working is a self-perpetuating asset", but It does not simply mean by giving duty in every kind of vocation you become able to improve your life quality. Take, for instance, a worker who starts his workday by taking a single duty which includes a repetition of the similar task to do. It is crystal clear that this worker might not become able to face every challenging aspect of his life. When a worker has a wide spectrum of many distinct types of duties, he could gain a wide range of abilities which can help him to face his own personal problems in the life too. By doing so, not only could workers improve their ability to face challenging aspects of the life, they could also provide a better future in his career because they are gaining different working abilities during these different experiences.
Furthermore, as far as I am concerned and regarding recent psychological statistics, doing different types of the task will not never make jack a dull boy. As a case in point, in one of the studies on two group of workers which one of them was engaged to do different task and the another was repeating a single duty in a day, psychologist figured out, after two months, most of the last group members were struggling with hard mental illnesses which indicator was a kind of depression sign in the group member’s behavior. By taking different duties in a workday, workers can guaranty their health quality, either mentally, or physically.
To make a long story short, in today's hectic lifestyle of human beings who are facing critical challenges in their lives, it is crucial to gain a wide spectrum of abilities, and as far as the worker's lifestyle is concerned, this goal would not be reached unless they not only have a high level of physical and mental health but gain different experiences. There is no shadow of a doubt, that this can be reached just by taking different types of tasks during their workday. So let's approach this goal by making the avenue of giving different tasks to workers who are a main body of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...o improve their life quality by working in an efficient way. In todays modern world which we are em...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 250, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...e is a heated debate among work experts as to whether workers should deal with a wide variety...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
... in point, in one of the studies on two group of workers which one of them was engage...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...pectrum of abilities, and as far as the workers lifestyle is concerned, this goal would...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...types of tasks during their workday. So lets approach this goal by making the avenue...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, as to, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2178.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72451193059 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68355406946 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509761388286 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.6217320501 48.9658058833 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.571428571 100.406767564 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9285714286 20.6045352989 160% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239648427756 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083316397969 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466326462745 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135014273957 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392701831486 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 58.1214874552 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.