Cars have been evaluated as one of the detrimental factors in society by scientists. I certainly agree that in twenty years cars in use will be fewer because of some reasons. Someone can consciously weight the pros and cons of each side.
First, infernal congestion is always a nightmare for people who live in major cities. All governments are trying to reduce cars in use by conducting developmental programs. Take Mexico city as an example, the government established the commuter cable car gliding above the chaos. Benefit from the cable car, thousands of residents turn to go to work or school by this facility. Rather than driving cars in a waste of time, taking color pods of the cable car seems more reasonable. This kind of cable car has been gaining popularity and in twenty years it can change the original way of commuting by cars.
Secondly, people become smarter to use the least energy when accomplish one thing and no one can deny driving cars is truly an energy consuming activity. For example, my friend Jason, an owner of a plastic company, has several meetings in different places every week. Because of the newly built high-speed rail, he discards the life of commuting by vehicle and looking for rare poking lots in hot days, especially in the extremely hot summer. In the light, clean and comfortable highspeed rail, Jason can take a short nap if he doesn’t sleep well last night and prepare himself for work. With the high-speed rail system getting more popular, citizens are more likely to leave their cars in garage.
Last but not least, more and more people regard environment maintain as their responsibility, and replacing cars with bicycles is a possible way. For instance, in Europe countries, eco-friendly policies have been conducted for several years. Government like the Netherlands encourages habitants to use bikes from bicycle sharing system instead of driving cars. Being kind to the environment is a shared vision for the whole human, and riding bikes is truly helpful.
To conclude, with the government’s exertion to reduce cars through developmental programs and motivation for citizens, public transportations and bicycles will take over cars by degrees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 43.0788530466 26% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1861.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12672176309 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80207407492 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595041322314 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5673391444 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9473684211 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1052631579 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 5.45110844103 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250460697058 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773728568743 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11411617587 0.0737576698707 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152695939883 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105158798484 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.