These days, people in growing numbers start to complain about the traffic problems and environment issues caused by too many cars on the road. Some of them claim that there will be less car use in 20 years. In my view, it is not realistic and there will be more car usage in 20 years.
To begin with, in 20 years more people will be able to afford cars. The development in economy has improved people’s life dramatically. With a higher income, more people have enough money to purchase a car nowadays than 20 years ago. It seems that the economy is not likely to turn bad in the near future, so it is a safe assumption that even a larger number of people will own their cars in 20 years. Also, the price of cars has been going down in the past decade. It is not hard to imagine that automobiles will be more accessible as time goes by and the number of car owners will rise.
Some may point out that the traffic congestion is a serious problem now, and the government is responsible to limit the number of private cars in big cities. It is only partly right. Too many cars will create more traffic, but limiting the use of cars will certainly cause inconvenience for people. There could be better solutions though. The government can enlarge the capacity of roads, or have more tall buildings to ensure that the land is more efficiently used, which will make room for more high ways. Either way will solve the problem.
People may argue that cars pollute the environment for they emit harmful gas waste into the air. They fail to mention the development in the field of electricity-powered cars in recent years. A growing number of people start to use these eco-friendly vehicles instead of those powered by fossil fuels. Instead of simply giving up the pleasure and convenience of driving in fear of doing harm to the environment, we can take actions to help develop new techniques that will make automobiles a green transportation.
From what has been discussed above, we may safely draw a conclusion that cars are not likely to be used less in the near future. By developing new technology and making use of the city land more efficiently, we can avoid the troubles of using cars while enjoy the benefits they bring to us. Without the worries of poisoning the air and congesting the road, more people will choose to drive cars.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60859188544 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56511622713 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520286396181 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7978698651 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7727272727 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0454545455 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.54545454545 5.45110844103 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302440725131 0.236089414692 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978367592745 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750379602353 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184403377446 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055960325556 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.