In twenty years, there will be fewer cars in use than there are today
With the advance in technology, an increasing number of cars have been producing by automobile companies and this has arisen some debates about the future of our planet. While some people believe that by twenty years, the number of cars will be decreasing, others believe that there will be more and more vehicles. In my opinion, the number of cars will increase in the next twenty years. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First, in twenty years world population will increase and thus more and more people will need means of transportation such as cars. In fact, the automobile has made our life comfortable and efficient: everyone desires owning a car since cars allow people to move easily. This explains why overpopulation means having more cars on our planet. For instance, in my country one family possesses two cars on the average: this number is surprisingly high, considering that in Italy there are lots of families. Besides, students usually receive a car as a gift for their graduation and the automobile has become a trend. If population increase in twenty years, as some researchers state, the number of cars in my country will be so high that many other problems will occur, such as the building of new parking areas and the development of factories in residential areas. Therefore, overpopulation will cause the increase in the quantity of cars existing on our planet.
Second, in twenty years there will be a decisive technological development. In fact, cars will become easier to manufacture thanks to automatic production. With the increasing demand of vehicles, companies have already spend money on research in the mechanical engineering field. Their aim is to multiply the production of cars in a safe way, that is following governments' regulations. Besides, the problem of pollution will be diminished since more and more scientists have been working on finding petroleum alternative. There will be less air contamination since less greenhouse gases will be emitted in the atmosphere. For example, researchers have been trying to use biomass as fuel with successful results: if this new type of gas develops all over the world, all the problems linked to petroleum will end. In fact, petroleum causes not only air contamination, but also marine pollution, serious diseases in human beings and destruction of entire ecosystems.
All in all, this essay discussed why in twenty years there will be an increase in the number of cars. This is because the world population will exponentially grow, because cars' manufacturing will improve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'spent'.
Suggestion: spent
...and of vehicles, companies have already spend money on research in the mechanical eng...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a safe way" with adverb for "safe"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...m is to multiply the production of cars in a safe way, that is following governments regulati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2186.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13145539906 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8923807773 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485915492958 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 688.5 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5399574088 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.095238095 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338553489926 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117480113532 0.076458572812 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829501514433 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239879468199 0.150856017488 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309206554067 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.