In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
Our planet is overcrowded by cars at present, and the amount of cars increases each day. I think that this tendency will be continued, and in twenty years we will have much more cars on the Earth, than we have today. There are several reasons for that, which will be discussed in the following essay.
First of all, further increase of the population on the Earth will lead to producing more automobiles. Nobody can deny that population grows on our planet. A good example of this is China, where, according to the relevant surveys, we will have 20 percent growth of populaion in less than twenty years. That in turn will result in producing more cars than we have today, because cars are vital for our normal lifebeing.
Secondly, there will not be any visible substitute for a car in the near future. All debates relating to the possible replacement of cars by other means of transportation are not serious enough. For example, the study conducted by Boston university proves that will not be able to alter cars by other means of transportation due to some technological and other objective constrains. Consequently, cars will remain as the most convenient and safe transportation in the near future.
Thirdly, more people will be living in big cities in the future. That means that more cars will be needed for use. This is due to the fact that living in big cities, as contrasted to living in small towns or villages, makes cars merely indispensable because of huge distances that city habitants have to cover each day in order to commute to and from their working places, etc. Therefore, unless this trend changes, the demand for cars will increase in big cities each year.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that cars are vital for our normal being and we will have more cars in the near future because of the increase of population and lack of substitutes for cars, as well as because of the trend of increasing of the population of big cities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 341.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73607038123 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63510909317 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480938416422 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 502.2 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4238892027 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.9375 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 5.45110844103 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374451809511 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141478261121 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973832425629 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224172538035 0.150856017488 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867652105485 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.