In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interested in other subjects. Do you agree or disagree?
In universities, people tend to concern more about the career prospect of the subjects they learn. Some people propose that students should learn subjects with a fast job growth including math, science, technology, and engineering even if they are interested in other subjects. Do you agree or disagree?
The subjects that we major in decide the future job we land. Facing the choices of subjects, some people held the opinion that a trendy occupation may make it easier to open up the job prospect. On the contrary, my opinion on this issue is that interests come first.
To begin with, those fast jobs nowadays don’t mean they are still trendy after our graduation. Commonly, a new policy is brought up and then the center of whole society shifts as the pace of the new law or policy. For example, a new law stimulating the medical industries was launched last year, following various of pharmacy company set up. This action greatly improves the available positions for the graduated students. Besides, freshmen of the universities would stand a better chance of selecting courses including the producing of the medicine, package of medicine and clinical experiment of medicine and so on in order to open up their job prospects.
However, if the local government is willing to shift the strategy again, other industries such as education, charities or economy may weigh out the pharmacy. The ignorant graduated students may commit a risk of high unemployment in this field.
Moreover, selecting a major courses we are intrigued would enable us to be adaptable to all kinds of situations. If we are interested in one peculiar thing, we would spend tens of thousands of hours to have a better understanding of that. For example, my best friend, Mike, is curious about chemistry when he grows up and he was dreaming to become a top chemist in the united states. To gain his knowledge base, it is usual for us to see that Mike may borrow all kinds of chemical book or video in the library in order to pick the mere knowledge of two subtle different compounds. Due to his spirt of learning, he has a clear structure of all kinds of organic molecules and would easily distinguish them just in a second. When asked why he is so amazed about the chemistry, Mike says that is has been one vital part of his body and soul. He loves this subject is not just for the fortune or the fame, but for his inner peace.
In a nutshell, it is necessary for us to choice an occupation considering the personal interests instead of the fast growth job. Personal interests which act as a shiny tower may help us at ease draw inspiration and its significance may weigh out the so-called job promotion or personal fortune.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isk of high unemployment in this field. Moreover, selecting a major courses we a...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 927, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e or the fame, but for his inner peace. In a nutshell, it is necessary for us to...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, then, for example, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78723404255 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68857381403 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1205749966 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.272727273 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.72727272727 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274082269003 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835336260832 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181083069896 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183715971331 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.291637907296 0.0645574589148 452% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.