The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two
summer vocation programs. Which one do you think is better for students?
1) Take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to
students' major.
2) Visit some history museums or historical relics.
With the rapid development of education, students' educational background is getting higher and higher. In order to maintain this phenomenon, the school offers students two kinds of summer courses. One is taking some college courses in advance for students, the other is visiting some history museum or historical relics. I assert students should put more focus on taking college courses, because it is necessary to master some college knowledge in advance.
For students, the advantage of learning college courses ahead of time is that they can learn more about the major they are interested in and learn some basic theories in advance. In this way, when students enter the university, they will be better adapt to the rhythm of the class and learn less. Of course, if a student comes into contact with some college courses before going to school, he will understand which courses he likes and suits himself, and which courses are not suitable for him. After weighing the pros and cons, choose the most suitable for their own major, rather than after the university / My sister took the sort of courses before going to university. After she learned some theories about her major, she received much knowledge which others do not receive. Also, her professor liked her and let her to be tutor in next semester.
Visiting some historic buildings or historical museums helps students improve their knowledge, but it also takes up a part of their time to study their own major. For science students, this activity works little help to their major, because history is not in their research field. It is unnecessary for non history majors to spend a lot of time in history, instead, it is a waste of time. According the lasts the data from People Daily Newspaper, it is reported that fifty percent of the students claimed that their major did not use history at all, and learning history would occupy their own major.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, of course, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 323.0 407.700716846 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93808049536 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40833117762 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551083591331 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8701902244 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64285714286 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389653720432 0.236089414692 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128685579967 0.076458572812 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0905008976938 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264427934234 0.150856017488 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105097654295 0.0645574589148 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.