What are some important qualities of a good supervisor(boss)? Use specific details and examples to explain why these qualities are important?
There have been some moot points about the important qualities of a good supervisor. The question of the significant characteristics of a good boss has aroused as a subject of controversy among academicians. Everyone has his or her zeitgeist. When it comes to my position, by weighing up the pros and cons, I strongly subscribe to the point that a good supervisor should be an expert in his field and fastidious in his work. I have some reasons, the most outstanding of which will be explicated in the ensuing paragraphs.
The first reason worth discussing here is that a supervisor should be familiars with everything in his field. He or she has to have great knowledge about what he wants to do. Therefore, he or she has to be an expert. When he is proficient in his field, he can solve every problem which his employer encounter with that. As a case to the point I vividly remember, two years ago I worked in the corporation which works in civil engineering fields. In the one project, we faced a big problem with providing a huge concrete for a structure under the water. We could not transmit this volume of concrete to that structure. Thus, our manager who was very expert in this field helped us to solve our problem. He advised me to use a canal for transforming concrete to that structure. My personal experience competently corroborates to the point that being an expert is one of the most important aspects of a boss.
By the same token, another paramount reason to be mentioned here is that being fastidious is another important reason for a good supervisor. If a boss does not fastidious in his work, his staffs will not do their duties in a true way. Strict people are serious in all things hence, they do everything in the best condition. My personal example demonstrates this reality, I am a supervisor in a building project which constructs a tall building. We have many labors in that project. I have very friendly behavior with my labors. Due to this behavior, I feel some bodies of these labors do not fulfill their duties very well. As a result, I changed my manner and became a fastidious supervisor. The corollary of this action leads to an alteration in labors functions dramatically. My personal example shed some light on the point that strict behavior is very important for a boss.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned reasons, I reiterate that, being expert and fastidious are the most important factors for a good supervisor. These characteristics not only boost employers workability but also ameliorate staffs functions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a true way" with adverb for "true"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rk, his staffs will not do their duties in a true way. Strict people are serious in all thing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, as to, i feel, as a result, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 444.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94760539536 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488738738739 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 663.3 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 21.0 9.59856630824 219% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9327788729 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6666666667 100.406767564 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4444444444 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.74074074074 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193023822332 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050774569664 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731054818288 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129987429919 0.150856017488 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512413944036 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.