What, in your opinion, has been the single most important scientific or technological development
of the last fifty years? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Since one year, the world has been faced the most horrible health and economic crisis. Billions of people became victims of the notorious coronavirus and died. Others suffer from severe respiratory illnesses and are in ICU hoping for their lives. Almost everyone have left jobless perhaps aside from doctors, nurses and grocery staff due to the imposed lock down in numerous countries which is a way to prevent spreading the virus. Newly, it has been announced that giant company called Pfizer discovered a vaccine to fight with the virus. I firmly believe that has been the essential development and I will explain why in the following essay.
First and foremost, many lives will be saved especially for those who are vulnerable with weak immune systems. When a person is inoculated with a vaccine, he allows the virus to enter his body. In this way the organism build up antibodies against the virus, hence a person won't get sick. No one can deny that there are numerous opponents that are skeptics about how the vaccine works. Even some went far beyond by asserting that the invention made by Pfizer is genetic and technological engineering that might contain microchip which is going to back up for controlling people or change human's DNA. However, these conspiracy theories are left in debate without accurate evidences and some developed countries undertook vaccination in order to improve elderly' life expectancy. It has been made many stages of experiments safeguarded until they introduce it to the humankind.
Furthermore, that breakthrough is going to help the global economy to step back on feet. This will enable many workers to return at all industrial sectors anew. The predicament will no longer halter the life pace routine to anyone. As a result the economy will be rejuvenated and people will not worry how to put down deadlines. For example, I was working on a river cruise and 3 months after the declared shutdown I was on furlough. It was extremely arduous to me, because I had many expenditures. However, I made it work somehow and now I unquenchable wait for my next embarkation on a ship in the near future. If the vaccine hadn't been discovered, the world would have afflicted more.
In a nutshell, with the help of scientists and molecular biology we will get out form the worst pandemic the contemporary humankind knows. Elderly lives won't be at stake anymore and tons of corporations, factories will turn back into the business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 629, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hadn't
...ship in the near future. If the vaccine hadnt been discovered, the world would have a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, even so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2047.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95641646489 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70261523728 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612590799031 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 657.0 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3891809306 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.34782608696 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0506145609249 0.236089414692 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0145517500661 0.076458572812 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273247852522 0.0737576698707 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294164102543 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029469285018 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.