When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
In today’s progressive and sophisticated world where we live, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effects of students’ education on their lives. In this regard, some people are inclined toward the opinion that if students work together, they will learn much. On the other hand, others think that they should work alone because that affects their education. Although both sides take their own positions, personally speaking, I finally believe that the first group carries more weight. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my viewpoints.
To begin with, students should cooperate with each other in accomplishing a project because that reduces their stress. In other words, when they meeting new friends relieves students' stress and helps them release their pent-up negative emotions. Moreover, students are encouraged to try hard in lessons by the social group so that increasing the educational performance of them. For instance, empirical research conducted by some master students at many universities shows that when students are engaged actively and enthusiastically in group work for accomplishing a project, their learnability will be increased dramatically. Therefore, if they work together, a good result will be obtained from their level of education.
The second reason coming to my mind is that when they work with each other, they help each other so all individuals learn almost all arduous and complex material appropriately in their field. To be more specific, that prepares students to be more expert problem solvers and creative thinkers in dealing with different problems and unprecedented challenges in the way of education. For example, when students have a practical class they have a lot of new equipment and work with them it's difficult and students help each other to do an experiment so they boost their knowledge and expand their horizons significantly in their lessons. Consequently, if they help each other, they will solve their problem.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that is work together more beneficial and conducive for students to do their assignments and homework in teamwork activity. Not only does it diminish stress, but it also helps each other to solve their problem which improves their educational performance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- 49 Tpo 3
- If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is important to know about events happening around the world even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 363.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39393939394 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90395238636 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556473829201 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7605288202 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6875 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.45110844103 200% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293880536441 0.236089414692 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103257749303 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645627742734 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187573212031 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343131559778 0.0645574589148 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 10.9000537634 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.