Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's progressive and sophisticated world where we live, no one can turn a blind eye to the significant effect of teachers on the development of society. Contrary to the opinion of many people that teachers have more respect and valued by people of society than in the past. I firmly believe that teachers do not have they don't have a good position in the community. In the following paragraphs, I will cogently explain my reasons to justify my viewpoints.
First, due to the emerging of the electronic class and the internet, the role of teachers is partly substituted. In other words, nowadays people access immense resources to learn their lessons. Moreover, in the past learning just occurred in their classroom and teachers were the best way to learn lessons but today's people have a lot of ways to learn and this is causing to some extent the value of teachers discounted. For instance, when I was a child, I had a problem with my mathematics lesson and I didn't know what should I did. So, I bought a tablet and I search for my problems on the internet and I founded a lot of sources like YouTube and some sites to solve my problems. If people use the internet and electronic class, they will less respect and value for teachers.
Secondly, the teachers have a low income in the community, so they have less appreciated and value than in the past. To more specific, currently, governments do not financially support teachers like what they did in the past. This lack of support from the government and society shows the value of teachers has decreased day after day. My own experience is convincing evidence of this. My grandfather and father were both teachers from two different generations. Whenever I look at their personal life, I see the vast difference, especially in economic. My grandfather's revenue relatively good, so he went abroad and he bought a very good car. On the other hand, my father barely gives houses expenses despite that he is a professional teacher that his father and he has a lot of financial problems in his life. Consequently, the more income teachers have, the more value teachers have in their society.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that teachers have more appreciation and value is more beneficial for society. Teachers have low value in society not only by emerging of the electronic class and the internet, but also by coming down their income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... believe that teachers do not have they dont have a good position in the community. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...roblem with my mathematics lesson and I didnt know what should I did. So, I bought a ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1992.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8115942029 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77391035122 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0905003393 48.9658058833 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8571428571 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248792609989 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794215782961 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669129716432 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162731279883 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362080042655 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.