Which one do you think is important to long-lasting friendship? Help you when you need
Share same interest and hobby
mutual trust
There exists an enormous quality that is necessary for a long-lasting relationship. IF I were a person who should choose just one characteristic among the given choices in the question— helpful, sharing his interest, and mutual trust—I would prefer the latest one, as this quality itself can make my friend helpful and sharing person. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that this quality makes my friend reliable person, therefore, I would be able to depend on her in any situation in my life, as I know for sure, she never judging me and gossiping about me. For instance, I when I was at high school, I had a trustworthy friend, I share my sadness and happiness with her without worry about she might reveal my personal life in front of others, as I have many experiences like that and now after eleven years we are still close friend together. As a result, if mutual trust is not between friends, how this relationship could continue for a long time.
In approaching this issue apart from the reason given above another reason that deserves some words is that since this quality gain over time, everything happens between friends they never leave each other. Back to the previous example, one of my classmate who was jealous about our relationship told me, my friend betrayed me with my boyfriend. Although at first, I get furious and nervous, the mutual trust convinced me she never does that. As people could not hide behind their lies, my classmate intention revealed and she could not ruin our relationship.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that even though other features such as helpful and sharing the interests is important for making a ling lasting relationship, none of them could compete with the mutual trust as the most important factor for protecting our relationship.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'judges'.
Suggestion: judges
... my life, as I know for sure, she never judging me and gossiping about me. For instance...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 186, Rule ID: LING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'long'?
Suggestion: long
...the interests is important for making a ling lasting relationship, none of them coul...
^^^^
Line 4, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...factor for protecting our relationship.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, still, therefore, apart from, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84036144578 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68364366402 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602409638554 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6003584229 53% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.6706451481 48.9658058833 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.090909091 100.406767564 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1818181818 20.6045352989 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100252563465 0.236089414692 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044549510263 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458239469077 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0770842404124 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434488063157 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.