which one give you better informtion for selecting for taking vacation. asking someone or reading online
In the progressive and sophisticated world where we live, people usually spend much money to take a vacation by traveling to different places so they need to acquire information about various places. Reaching this goal, some individuals prefer to read online about places, however, others adhere to the idea that discussing with someone who has visited two places helps them to know more. I subscribe to the former view because of some reasons that I will elaborate on following paragraphs.
To begin with, searching for information online through internet saves our time and energy. Our desired information are accessible in various websites so we are able to increase our knowledge when and where they want. Asking from or discussing with others needs to spend time finding them after wasting time because of traffic congestion. To shed light on this matter, I will bring up an example in which I was involved. In the second year of bachelor studies at university, we had an assignment related to history class to gain information about historical places in Italy. Some students just get information by internet but I prefer to have a meeting with someone who attend in one famous tour. Finally, I could not prepare my project before deadline because I forced to travel to Italy to visit this person. Furthermore, I spend much time to adjust my time with that person. This example aptly illuminates how beneficial and important it is to increase our knowledge through online devices and tools.
Another valuable point is that, the more one sources be comprehensive, the more we can get information and compare more places to each other. Online search is a main source of information because all features of countries save in special website to help tourists during their journey. However, peoples who have traveled to some countries just know about these places and do not have knowledge about others so travelers cannot compare advantages and disadvantages of their desired places. Furthermore, their information is just based on their point of view and their judgment of specific situation so sometimes they are not fair. The Asian society of managing tourism industry declares that about 70 percent of travelers prefer to get information by online media than experienced people because they can trust to these information well. Finally, by reading online we can know everything we want to know about a specific place.
In conclusion, taking above reasons and example into account, one can logically conclude that reading online about various places in better than asking from others. Since, we can save our time and energy, also the information is comprehensive and comparable in this method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the progressive and sophisticated wor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 812, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ienced people because they can trust to these information well. Finally, by reading online we can...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 441.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13832199546 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.714517766 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2478260282 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111282346991 0.236089414692 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362569952677 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476178887139 0.0737576698707 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0817295849974 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366784507265 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.