Which one is the most important factor to help you work productively?
• Having an environment free of noise and distractions
• Knowing that you will receive a reward
• Doing something you are interested in
In today's modern and sophisticated world, being creative plays a vital role in people's success. In this connection, brain productivity is improved by exploiting several avenues. Although some people believe that reducing a surrounding's noise can be a plus to be productive, many other people hold the view that rewarding encourages one to be innovative. There is still the third group who concurs with the notion that performing enjoyable tasks lead to innovation. I agree with the last group's opinion, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
Firstly, people have a significant concentration on the subjects in which they are interested, so they become innovative. To be more specific, while people decide to do something which is appealing to them, they won't abandon thinking of them readily, and nothing can disturb their attention. Hence, they can consider all aspects of subjects preciously, causing innovative ideas. According to my own experience, I participated in an undesirable class at university, so the environment was not pleasant for me, and I was busy with mobiles during a class, so much so that I could not understand my lessons. Accordingly, I did not complete my assignments accurately; moreover, all the stuff in my surrounding appeared more enjoyable for me than homework, so they distract my attention. However, other pupils who enjoy solving their assignments, invented unique solutions because they did not conduct projects superficially like me. As they were interested in doing them, they contemplate all facets of problems, which provided hints to create specific solutions.
Secondly, people intend to gain a wealth of information in titles that are fascinating for them; thus, this considerable amount of information helps them to be productive. To elucidate, one prefers to allocate a tremendous amount of time to the enjoyable subjects, so they can collect more data about them. By reading and studying articles, the possibilities of inventing new things increase. For example, I am so interested in my project's topic, so I dedicate time to broaden my horizon in this field by reading more complicated cases and analyzing materials. My high level of knowledge approaches me toward a combination of the different methods which I have learned and guide me to innovative achievements.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that interesting subjects guide people toward productivity. Not only does enjoyable topics enhance one's attention, but it also provides insight into varied sources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'groups'' or 'group's'?
Suggestion: groups'; group's
...ad to innovation. I agree with the last groups opinion, and I will analyze my reasons ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1060, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ded hints to create specific solutions. Secondly, people intend to gain a wealth...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 182, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Not only does enjoyable topics enhance ones attention, but it also provides insight...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, third, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2181.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 405.0 407.700716846 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38518518519 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10324893296 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602469135802 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5994416735 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.789473684 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3157894737 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870562717871 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.026267199194 0.076458572812 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210108855309 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0501218232543 0.150856017488 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0109443451042 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.