Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students do reading by their own personality is as important as, or more important than reading assigned by teachers.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, an educational system plays a vital role in students' success in the future. In this connection, there are several learning methods that students can use to improve their knowledge. Although contested by many that the matter of studying the materials which learners decide to read is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I concur with the notion that it can be a plus for students to read the topics, which teachers are designated, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, teachers have insight into all useful materials and resources; hence, they are competent to assign reading for pupils. To be more specific, as teachers have valuable experience in the teaching field, they can decide wisely as well as objectively; however, students are inclined to read the materials in which they are interested, thereby not covering all lessons. According to my own experience, when I was a high school student, my teacher forced all students to read specific articles. All students protested against our tutor's decisions since we wanted the freedom to choose subjects. All students passed the final exams wonderfully; moreover, our school was known as the best in our city. If learners had chosen the reading materials, we would not have achieved success because we could not distinguish which papers were beneficial; furthermore, we preferred to study only our favorite courses.
Second, when teachers decide what materials pupils should read, all learners gain the same information, leading to excellent time management in a class. To elucidate, each student prefers distinctive resources to read, so they cannot give the same information and background about lessons; thus, it causes disorder during a class. For example, my sister can decide about the book which she wants to study for chemistry class independently without monitoring by her teacher. As a result, when she participates in the class, each student presents obstacles, which other learners do not face with them in their books. Therefore, their teacher should explain each question exclusively, which dissipated a tremendous amount of time, so much so that they do not have enough time to finish a chemistry lesson.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that it has a privilege for students when their teacher assigns what they should read. Not only do tutors have sufficient information about all materials, but they also can manage classes significantly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29879518072 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8461656701 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559036144578 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9726389705 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.352941176 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4117647059 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219666282798 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772260788243 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445096662017 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143941679791 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118727622452 0.0645574589148 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.