Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
The influence of technology has recently been the topic of debate among experts. Some people think technology improvements have a positive impact on children's creativity. However, other people disagree with them. In my view, technology has made children less creative than they were in the past due to decreasing their social communication and quickly getting everything. I will explain my reason hereunder.
First, technology improvement makes children alone, as they spend much time stay at home and play tablets. Hence, they are less creative. For example, my cousin spends a lot of time playing online games. Consequently, he always stays home and does not communicate with other people or make friends. As a result, he never understands the issues and problems that other people or other places have. Moreover, he does not think about problems and solutions. Thus, decreasing your social community makes you less creative, as you do not face society's problem.
Second, technology helps children to get information in each field and solve what problems they have. As a result, they do not try hard to get something themselves, and they become less creative. For example, my daughter had homework yesterday. She searched for all information on the internet, and she did not try to answer the questions herself. After two hours, she completed her homework! When I was at her age, this homework took me at least one week. I was so creative comparing to my daughter today. Thus, technology makes children get what they want without any efforts, and it makes them less creative.
In conclusion, technology makes people less creative. That is due to reducing their social communication and quickly getting everything.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, moreover, second, so, thus, at least, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 52.1666666667 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1977.66487455 73% => OK
No of words: 277.0 407.700716846 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20577617329 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7857360429 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 212.727598566 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574007220217 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 618.680645161 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.621454397 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.6666666667 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.1904761905 20.6045352989 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326029306479 0.236089414692 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899470218456 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12891944338 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19994877461 0.150856017488 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122102194932 0.0645574589148 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 58.1214874552 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.05 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 86.8835125448 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.