Which one of the reasons is most important in helping students to study in colleges and universities?
• Having access to the university to tutors who can provide individual instruction for the students who have difficulty in study.
• Having the help and encouragement from the family and friends.
• Having an excellent teachers in high-school who can help the students before the university.
In today's modern and sophisticated world, studying in colleges and universities is a vital part of students' lives. In this connection, there are several avenues that help learners at university. Although some people believe that accessing to professors at university is helpful for learners to solve their learning problems, many other people hold the view that families and friends can encourage learners and help them. There is still the third group who concurs with the notion that expert teachers in high-schools are beneficial for university students. I agree with the third group opinion, and I will analyze my reasons throughout this essay.
First, if tutors in a high-school teach deeply, students won't have difficulties in performing their college's tasks; thus, they help pupils significantly. To be more specific, when students learn prerequisites before attending a university, they grasp all the necessary information which is needed for their future. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, in the first semester, I met a wealth of unfamiliar information. However, many other students learned them before because their high-school teachers pointed to cardinal and principle knowledge wonderfully. As a result, I felt a tremendous amount of stress based on my poor ability to understand subjects, but others felt calm as concepts were familiar for them.
Second, excellent teachers in high-schools are very helpful as they save student's time at the university. To elucidate, students will dissipate a considerable amount of time in colleges unless they become familiar with modern learning methods. By doing so, they will comprehend courses in less time than those who use conventional ways to learn. For example, when I went to college, one of my classmates gave her a high-school degree in a famous school in a city with accomplished teachers. Her teacher taught impressive skills, such as surfing on the net to gain desirable knowledge. Accordingly, when all pupils did not understand new topics at university, they should read countless books to realize them wasting their time. However, my skillful classmate could gain specific information by a simple click or watching educational movies on Youtube.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on each side, I profoundly believe that having an excellent teacher in the high-school having benefits. Not only do virtue teachers teach an essential concept, but they also help students to learn conveniently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 853, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...watching educational movies on Youtube. To conclude, while there are several arg...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, third, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42455242967 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00440651166 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57800511509 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3668377876 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.631578947 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 5.45110844103 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250743481698 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731361691896 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602815466832 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155703133724 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556114581099 0.0645574589148 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.