Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's world, working and its efficiency are of paramount importance. The satisfaction of workforce from the circumstances of job and the atmosphere of its environment play a key role in the thriving of companies. A controversial question which is often raised regarding this issue is whether worker would like to do different type of tasks or similar tasks all day long. Some people possess the conviction that the former is could be a better choice, whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I personally contend that workers are more satisfied if they implement various tasks than merely cooperate in one special task. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represents a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this issue that human beings are inherently variety-seeking. People often like to do lots of works in different fields in order to express themselves and demonstrate their abilities. The noteworthy statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in our country which is comprised of carried out studies on more than 2000 laborer, show that the great number of laborers (more than 75%) like to experience different tasks during their work time.
The second rationale behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that experiencing different tasks could have conspicuous advantages. For example, it can augment the creativity of the work forces. Moreover, it leads to heighten self-reliance and self-esteem of them. All of these positive points can assist the worker in his occupational life in the future. Consequently, he would be a skilled person with a strong resume. In addition of all these pros points, participating in various works has a significant effect on spiritual conditions of the laborer.
In brief, contemplating all the aforementioned reasons, one soon realizes that not only workforce do not incline to have just one task during the day, but also they have a tendency to participate in different tasks and this could be absolutely beneficial for them. As a result, it is highly recommended that employers pay attention to their workers and attempt to provide a conducive condition for employees to be prosperous and satisfied.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 427, Rule ID: IS_SHOULD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... possess the conviction that the former is could be a better choice, whereas other...
^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind elucidating'.
Suggestion: mind elucidating
...reasons. The first reason coming to mind to elucidate my standpoint is concerned with this is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...research conducted in our country which is comprised of carried out studies on more than 2000 l...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different tasks during their work time. The second rationale behind this opinion...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...skilled person with a strong resume. In addition of all these pros points, participating...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in brief, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 373.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24128686327 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03973451347 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592493297587 0.524837075471 113% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8246470482 48.9658058833 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 5.45110844103 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285284576115 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718109583588 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956020718919 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165313416046 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671492769975 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.