Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
20;16
As time passes and people become more developed; they become more aware of the importance of their satisfaction. In such a soficticated world, where we are living, people are involved with their tasks, obligations, and responsibilities, to name but a few. They make their efforts to have more contentment when they work in work places. Moreover, there are many criteria which make a significant contribution to increasing people's satisfaction. The controversial question which arises here is whether people are happier when they get involved in diverse tasks in their occupations or when they do similar tasks during the workday. I personally contend that the majority of people are happier when they do diverse types of tasks all day long. In what follows, two elaborated reasons will vindicate my standpoints.
The first reason is that although people are able to do their tasks very quickly when they do similar tasks all day long, they may become frustrated and even discouraged to do their tasks, so it has a destructive impact on people's performances in the work places. When people do diverse tasks, they are faced with a profuse amount of challenges, problems, and issues which make the work exciting and attracting for people. In this way, people not only are more eager to do their best to solve the problems or complete tasks, the but also are more satisfied with their works. For example, working in a laboratory would be a exciting and attracting experience. People always encounter various reactions, materials, staffs, and equipment which make this work very attractive.
The second reason is that if people do similar tasks all day, they can learn these tasks in an excellent manner; they can be expert in these tasks. Not only can these tasks be boring for people over time, but also they do not have many things to learn. People who work diverse tasks during the workday can lean various and precious things in the workplaces. They can expand their knowledge in diverse fields and their experineces which help them to be more satisfied in their life. For example, a manager has a lot of tasks and obligations during the workday. He can learn how to manage and solve problems, how to make a good decision and how to take a risk which put an excellent mood on him, and he is more satisfied.
In short, all aforementioned reasons above lead us to this conclusion that people can have a positive sense about their tasks in work places when they are assigned diverse tasks and obligation. They not only lean invaluable thing and lessons by working in this places, but also they can have more attractive job thanks to the diverse tasks and diverse challenges which they faced.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ample, working in a laboratory would be a exciting and attracting experience. Peo...
^
Line 6, column 90, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an excellent manner" with adverb for "excellent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sks all day, they can learn these tasks in an excellent manner; they can be expert in these tasks. Not...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 257, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...aluable thing and lessons by working in this places, but also they can have more att...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1977.66487455 114% => OK
No of words: 458.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91266375546 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66677472242 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441048034934 0.524837075471 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9097804301 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.5 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375886120141 0.236089414692 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140699217802 0.076458572812 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118304495823 0.0737576698707 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274529790398 0.150856017488 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467343692757 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 10.9000537634 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.