Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Satisfaction is a crucial point when it comes to your work, since people spend a great fraction of their time working. Many people would claim doing similar tasks during their workdays would be more satisfying. However, I disagree with that idea. Doing same task over and over again could be boring and would kill workers creativity. In what follows, I will delve into the most crucial reasons to substantiate my viewpoint.
First of all, when we repetitively do a same kind of an activity for a long time, eventually we will become bored and tired. So it is working. Doing same kind of a work all day long can even decrease the energy of workers very faster, since there is no diversity in their job. I can mention my friend as an example. She was working in a coffee shop as a busboy. She would only clean the tables and bring back the dishes during her working hours. There wasn't anything new or interesting in her job and she was always complaining about her job. Eventually she became tired and left the coffee shop to find a better job. This is how lack of diversity could cause tiredness instead of satisfaction and joy.
Moreover, when workers are assigned to many different kinds of tasks, they are forced to learn more and discover wider aspects of their abilities. As a result, they will be more skillful and creative than workers that are doing similar task in their work place. In order to be successful they need to be more dynamic and learn new types of task faster. This kind of workers never would become tired of their job, since they are involved in enough creativity and variety that would make them even more interested in their job. This kind of a work is more valuable and more efficient. As a result, the workers would be more satisfied too.
As a conclusion, it is important for workers to have diversity in their work. Doing the repetitive task for a long period of time can cause dissatisfaction and tiredness, while more diverse tasks help the workers to gain more energy and satisfaction. This is due to the fact that, they are working dynamically and creatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'an' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... of all, when we repetitively do a same kind of an activity for a long time, eventually we...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...and tired. So it is working. Doing same kind of a work all day long can even decrease the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... dishes during her working hours. There wasnt anything new or interesting in her job ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 40, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... Moreover, when workers are assigned to many different kinds of tasks, they are forced to lear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 375, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'would' and 'become'.
Suggestion: would never become
...es of task faster. This kind of workers never would become tired of their job, since they are invo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 532, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...even more interested in their job. This kind of a work is more valuable and more efficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 116, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...k. Doing the repetitive task for a long period of time can cause dissatisfaction and tiredness...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, kind of, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 372.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6747311828 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50794206157 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489247311828 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3121562719 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.6086956522 100.406767564 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1739130435 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.26086956522 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315925567212 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831421723928 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081644394253 0.0737576698707 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195620415545 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627897119423 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 11.7677419355 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 58.1214874552 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.1575268817 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.