Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today, working is an inseparable part of our life. We have to work to earn enough money to provide our needs in life. The question is what kinds of works will satisfy us more. Some people prefer doing repetitive same tasks; however, other ones are more satisfied by doing different tasks during their workday. In my opinion, doing different types of tasks during a workday is much better because repetitive similar tasks are so boring. Additionally, diversify tasks will increase your creativity rather than similar ones. I will illustrate my reasons in the following paragraphs.
First, we will become bored by doing the same tasks during a workday and consequently, our productivity will decrease. When you repeat a similar task again and again for 7-9 hours, your mind will become bored and your productivity will decrease in turn. I remember once my boss asked me to fill out some forms to send for our costumers. Although there were a big number of them to fill out, I accepted the work because I assumed that an easy job. It took the whole of a daywork to me to fill out those forms. Every time that I remember that experience I get upset because that work was so boring. I felt sleepy and confused after filling one-third of those forms with the same information. The speed of my work falt down after three continuous hours of work and I exhausted so much. As a result, I tired more than my ordinary workdays at the end of that day as time as I hadn’t good feelings about my self because I wasn’t sure about filling all of them correctly. Hence, repetitive the same works are more boring; thus, I don’t prefer them.
Second, there is more creation opportunity during doing diversify tasks. When you have a lot of tasks to do, you will learn to find methods to do all of them in the best way. You will learn to plan, to put the tasks in an order of their importance to do and moreover, you will learn to do some tasks in a new better way. As a result, these kinds of works will increase your creative ability and your satisfaction will increase in turn. For example, consider a person who works as a secretary in a big office. He has a lot of diversifying tasks to do. One thing, which is obvious, is that he should do more important tasks first, such as making agenda, calling meeting members to announce them about meeting time, sending more important mails before their deadlines, etc. Some other tasks, such as archieving answered letters, calling costumers to receive their feedbacks, faxing advertising posters, etc. have less importance than previous ones. Thus, a qualified secreter will learn to get an order to his tasks to do during a workday according to their importance as well as he will find some creative forms to do his tasks, such as using a software to send similar letters to a big number of costumers instead of sending them one by one. Thus, thinking more creativity will improve his performance; consequently, he will feel better about himself and satisfy more than a lazy noncreative person.
Based on the aforementioned explanations, it can be concluded that doing different tasks during a workday is much better than doing the same tasks because they are less boring and more creative.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, thus, well, for example, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 43.0788530466 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2679.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 567.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72486772487 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87972968509 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61235315661 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444444444444 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 837.0 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0344827586 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3793103448 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5517241379 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.89655172414 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324100526147 0.236089414692 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902494317727 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911312456226 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242135790221 0.150856017488 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797315548166 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 11.7677419355 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.