tpo48-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage.
The passage and the professor discuss the frog’s population decline problem, which has occurred recently. The passage proposes three ways to deal with the problem. Whereas, the professor dismisses all of them through some explanations.
First, the passage suggests passing a constraint law for using pesticides in farms which are on neighborhood of frog’s habitat. On the other hand, the professor explains that If this law goes into effect, a big economical loss will occur. It is because farmers significantly will lose their crops in the area; thereby, they cannot compete with neighboring farmers. Thus, neighborhood farmers will control the market.
Second, the passage proposes applying antifungal medication on frogs to treat and prevent infection which occurs by a specific fungus and leads to frogs die. In contrast, the professor rules this suggestion out because antifungal treatment has to apply to each frog individually and to their offsprings too; indeed, it is an impractical method because capturing that big number of frogs and treating them is difficult, complicated and expensive.
Third, the reading claims that protecting lakes and wetlands from excessive usage by humans will lead to saving frogs through saving their habitat. However, the professor believes that the human effect on lakes, marshes and other wetlands is much less than the global warming effect. As a result, the suggested way cannot decrease the effect of global warming on disappearing water from wetlands. Thus, the problem will remain unsolved as before.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es three ways to deal with the problem. Whereas, the professor dismisses all of them th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...hat If this law goes into effect, a big economical loss will occur. It is because farmers ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, whereas, as to, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50622406639 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75845928727 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605809128631 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.9966468491 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.076923077 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340110900878 0.272083759551 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109870177581 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100302470142 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195070607446 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559540820556 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.