Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
For an employer, employee satisfaction can be a very important challenge to consider in the current industrial age. The worldwide economy is recovering from a massive recession and being steadily and successfully employed can be a quite rare and seldom appearing. I believe that when unemployment rates are as high as today - and as shown by recent studies they can be as high as 20 percent - workers are more concerned with having a job than what that job is comprised of.
Ergo, the more a worker is assured of job security, the more satisfied they will be. I can think of many reasons why this statement holds true.
First and foremost, I believe that a reverse relationship exists between job excitement and volatility of employment or job security. In my view, the more stable the job is, the more mundane the tasks become and they will be more repetitive to do all-day long. Therefore I would associate a steady but non-volatile and secure job with boring, mundane and repetitive tasks empirically.
In my vista, a working class citizen has to first deal with costs of living. When these costs are high and so are unemployment and inflation rates, workers will be more satisfied to know that the company they work with can provide a steady pay and pension for long periods of time. They will be happier to know that their company will stand the test of time and for example unlike many company bankruptcies during the global economic meltdown of 2008 that resulted in many people losing their jobs, their company will stand strong during adversities. Such a worker could care less for short-lived excitement a volatile job brings.
Furthermore, the global economic meltdown of 2008 resulted in a paradigm shift in workers' minds. Now having a steady pay is the deciding factor for many people psychologically. Suppose that you have seen a global recession after an stock bubble burst and you have seen many people lose their jobs and livelyhoods. Would you be more inclined to have a volatile but exciting job or a stable, mundane job which is composed of similar tasks? I would surmise that you would prefer the latter.
To wrap it up, I believe that security and non-volatilty in an age of recession and fickle financial prosperity, redound to workers' satisfaction. And based on my observations, such factors are more pronounced in jobs which require doing similar tasks all day long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 458, Rule ID: IS_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of' or 'is composed of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of; is composed of
...ed with having a job than what that job is comprised of. Ergo, the more a worker is assured...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... be more repetitive to do all-day long. Therefore I would associate a steady but non-vola...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 566, Rule ID: COULD_CARE_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'couldn't care less'?
Suggestion: couldn't care less
...trong during adversities. Such a worker could care less for short-lived excitement a volatile j...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... you have seen a global recession after an stock bubble burst and you have seen ma...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 52.1666666667 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.914004914 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398109251 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503685503686 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 629.1 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5037731344 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.263157895 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.89473684211 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248325940427 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757670868217 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793738545935 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137744486137 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357995127529 0.0645574589148 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.